VINDICATED—IT’S FORGED: Over 12 discrepancies in Roy Moore’s alleged yearbook signature.

On Monday, Beverly Young Nelson presented a yearbook that was allegedly signed by Roy Moore in 1977. In the actual signature, there are 8 discrepancies, and over a dozen with the date and location included. It is now apparent that U.S. Senatorial candidate Roy Moore is the victim of a massive political attack to destroy his campaign.

We have obtained an official signature of Judge Roy Moore from a U.S. Term Limits Amendment Pledge that he signed on July 24, 2017.

First we will begin with the “Roy Moore” signature in the 1977 year book, and compare it to his actual signature:

1. The 1977 Yearbook has a loop in the first downward stroke of the letter “R.” The actual signature does not.

2. The middle of the uppercase “R” is mangled, and does not meet with the second upward stroke, as it does with the actual signature.

3. The lowercase “y” has a large loop. The actual signature does not.

4. The closing stroke of the signature with the letter “y” extends outward. The letter “y” in the actual signature extends upward, loops and then goes downward, after crossing the first loop of the uppercase “R” twice.

5. The starting point begins at the top arch of the uppercase “M” and then loops before creating the first arch. In the actual signature, the starting point begins below the first arch, and does not have a loop.

6. There is not a tail on the closing stroke of the uppercase “M.” In the actual signature, there is a tail.

7. The first “o” is larger than the second “o.” In the actual signature, the second “o” is larger than the first “o.”

8. The “e” in the 1977 year book signature has a small loop. The “e” in the actual signature has a large loop.

Secondly, we will compare the “Olde Hickory House” to his printed name.

9. The “e” is clearly different and has a starting point below the line, then loops. The actual printed “e” directly begins with the loop.

10. The lowercase “r” is uppercase. In the actual printed writing, the “r” is clearly lowercase.

11. The “y” has a curved dip. The actual printed “y” has a sharp angled stroke.

12. The “o” is opened on the right. In the actual printed writing, the “o” is indented on the left and closed.

As you can see, this is a clear forgery.

This observation of the signature and handwriting verifies Moore’s claim that did not sign the yearbook or know Nelson. He also expressed that he was unaware of the “Olde Hickory House” location.

“I can tell you without hesitation this is absolutely false,” Moore told reporters on Tuesday. “I never did what she said I did. I don’t even know the woman. I don’t know anything about her. I don’t even know where the restaurant is or was.”

This yearbook was used as evidence to frame Roy Moore as attempting to rape the girl that owned the book. Ironically, rather than substantiating the molestation accusation, the forgery has actually vindicated Judge Moore.



  1. David H.

    November 14, 2017 11:22 am at 11:22 am

    It is an attack from the establishment. REPUBLICANS included. It is going to get ugly everywhere there is a “deplorable” running against an elitist establishment candidate. WE as the Public have to let those attacks bounce off, and not be phased by fake news, and do nothing congressmen, as we drain the swamp.

    • Proud deplorable

      November 15, 2017 11:17 pm at 11:17 pm

      What caught my attention immediately is that the second stroke on the “M”, at the top, the forger HESITATED before finishing moving into the downward stroke to finish out the “M”. VERY obvious. Judge Moore’s “M” is fluid.

      • BrianDraiger

        December 8, 2017 1:29 pm at 1:29 pm

        Its not just that.
        The “MOORE” and date added was in a different ink and she admitted to writing it in.
        The “Moore” portion though, attempts to look like Moore’s actual signature.
        It’s not accidental that she tried to make the M look like his actual signature.
        THAT, in itself, looks like an attempt at forgery.

    • David H.

      November 16, 2017 8:21 am at 8:21 am

      What Most commenting here are missing is that this sort of false accusation was predicted to occur before the end of days and the Return of the King of kings. Those who are not ready for the Return of Jesus are going to be cast into the lake of fire.

      Are you ready? or does Hellfire await you?

      • Robert Zeurunkl

        December 9, 2017 6:41 pm at 6:41 pm

        Amen, Bro. Strong Delusion, man. Strong delusion.

    • Robert T. Mark, IV

      November 16, 2017 9:51 am at 9:51 am

      SAD! Nothing more pathetic than these types of tortured arguments in the face of a parade of shame from local, known Alabama women with nothing to gain and everything to lose by coming forward on monster Moore. BTW – the ‘discrepancies’ on the samples are all minor and easily explained by 40 years of ‘signature drift’ as Moore’s signature drops loops and flourishes he affected when younger. Thanks for the laughs.

      • Roger Stritmatter

        November 18, 2017 11:17 am at 11:17 am

        Indeed. This bogus analysis is all based on what is called, statistically, “overfitting,” i.e. based on minor variations in formal detail that on comparison with a larger sample are revealed to be aspects of the natural variation of any writer. On the contrary, the comparison overwhelmingly suggests that

        1) This is not a forgery (none of the telltale signs of forgery including hesitation and variation in line quality are present;

        2) the pen motion, relative shapes and orientations of letters, such as the pronounced extra height of the second lobe of the M, all support the identification of Moore as the writer of both samples.

        To definitively conclude based on this limited sample that Moore is the writer of both documents might be a stretch; experts will want a larger sample size and access to the original documents. But to assert that there is evidence here of forgery is simply pseudo-science.

        But what should we expect from a creepy hypocrite like judge Moore?

    • David H.

      November 16, 2017 8:16 pm at 8:16 pm

      Roy Moore’s letter to Sean Hannity.

    • Steven Smith

      November 17, 2017 7:53 am at 7:53 am

      What this shows is that she annotated the wishes in her yearbook with location and date.
      The wish’s signature and writing still matches his handwriting and he’s not vindicated.

  2. Jeannie

    November 14, 2017 3:05 pm at 3:05 pm

    Also note the forgery of the NUMBERS/DATES. The “7”s done by the REAL Roy Moore (versus the forger) are written totally different, as are the number “2”s. Quite the nasty job of forgery there, trying to smear an innocent man simply because he’s a REPUBLICAN RUNNING FOR OFFICE!!! TIME TO GET READY FOLKS – THE DEMONRATS WILL BE SPOUTING ALL OF THEIR HATE AND LIES TRYING TO DISCREDIT ANYONE RUNNING AGAINST THE LIBTURD/DEMONRAT PARTY CANDIDATES!!!

    • Cassmish

      November 15, 2017 6:11 pm at 6:11 pm

      I think if it had been a forgery it would have looked more similar (be a better forgery, if you like) as they know people would be rushing to prove it a forgery.
      However, the 2s and 7s actually look remarkably similar, especially that little hook or whatever it is at the start of the first stroke of the 7.

      • Truth Speaker

        November 15, 2017 8:16 pm at 8:16 pm

        They used what they thought was his actual signature for the forgery, that’s the irony, and is why they thought it would work. The woman had a divorce hearing with Judge Moore (despite her lie that they never met after the incident). The signature’s “D.A.” is the initials of the assistant who signed on the judge’s behalf (Deborah Adams). She most likely had the paperwork with his clerk having signed on his behalf, and attempted to use this to forge everything after the word “Roy.”

        So everything after the word “Roy” is most certainly a forgery, and more than likely comes from his own assistant’s handwriting from the accuser’s divorce hearing, presided by Moore.

        What’s even stranger is the fact that the “Roy” and everything prior to it appears to quite likely be not Roy at all, but “Ray,” as in Ray Brooks, who she went to school with. It appears to be a kind of poem, with Ray rhyming with the words. This would also explain why the accuser’s own attorney misspoke and pronounced it “Ray,” needing then to be corrected.

        • chris

          November 16, 2017 2:06 am at 2:06 am

          I agree with you that everything after “Roy” appears forged. But I immediately understood the date and “Old Hickory House” to be embellishments done afterwards by Beverly Nelson, not constituting forgery.

          The thing is…. She may have forged “Moore DA” and I’m guessing that will get her into trouble — but what about the rest of the note? Surely that needs to be taken into account and unbiased handwriting experts will certainly prove or disprove that portion. Even if the event happened as she said it did, if she forged “Moore DA”.. her whole testimony will be thrown out. From there… we’ll have to see what other 5 accusers have to say.

          • Kudos

            November 16, 2017 2:49 am at 2:49 am

            When one is being accused of assault/child molester essentially…then any altering of supposed evidence is DAMNING immediately to the accuser imo. So any forgery = she is lying and trying to damage Roy as much as possible [for money i bet].

          • Kudos

            November 16, 2017 2:51 am at 2:51 am

            The other 5 accusers are just there to reinforce the alleged 14 year old at the time, testimony and this woman who is claiming assault…It all looks fraudulent, i believe Gloria Allred is behind all of this, she probably called the Washington Post and gave them the initial story so that she cant be tracked back to for all of it…But its clearly all being done to damage Roy [even with lies] to get Doug Jones a senate seat.

          • Philip

            November 17, 2017 3:31 am at 3:31 am

            It was stated that Roy Moore wrote all of it.

        • jack slap

          November 18, 2017 9:20 pm at 9:20 pm

          I agree that the name is Ray, not Roy. The point where it begins and how it how it curves up and back down to connect to the y is indicative of a cursive a, not a cursive o. When you look at the judges cursive o to y connection, he doesn’t drop the bridge down to the y, but keeps the first arm of the y lifted up. The differences are not a matter of variability over time. Moore doesn’t loop the standing part of his letters as did Ray. The blue-ink portions don’t match the cursive style of Ray. The obvious loops of Ray are not carried over to Moore, and what becomes obvious is that even if the loops of Ray are because of an older style, then Moore should also manifest that same loop style in the M, but it doesn’t. Instead, there is the loop style of Ray, and then the attempt to forge the judges current style of Moore. You can’t claim an old style for one part of the signature and a current style for the other part of the signature. If there are loops in the R there should be loops in the M as well.

      • Truth Speaker

        November 15, 2017 8:30 pm at 8:30 pm

        Also, your actual logic:

        A: Authentic documents have no inconsistencies because they are authentic.
        B: Forged documents have no inconsistencies because they would be forged so well.
        C: Therefore, all documents are authentic.

        QED genius. Real smart thinking.

        • Kudos

          November 16, 2017 2:47 am at 2:47 am

          Very nice posts and informative, thank you.

    • Anonymous

      November 16, 2017 12:22 pm at 12:22 pm

      DemonRat….that’s a good one!!

    • Steven Smith

      November 17, 2017 7:55 am at 7:55 am

      He is by no way innocent.

      The number of accusations, his own admissions while interviewed and the patterns match across all the accusations.

  3. Judson S.

    November 14, 2017 3:40 pm at 3:40 pm

    I see many more similarities than I do dissimilarities. In my own handwriting, I have changed how I write certain letters and numbers over the years, especially because my handwriting is poor and I am always trying different things to distinguish some numbers or letters from others. Also, my letters may look different if I am block printing them as opposed to half-cursive/half-printing, as I sometimes do.

    The handwriting quality between the two is remarkably similar. I have heard from handwriting experts (I had to hire a few over the years as an attorney) that handwriting quality is one of the first things they look for. This is because it is nearly impossible for a person to write much better than he usually does, so if a “forgery” has significantly better quality writing than the confirmed writing sample, it indicates a forgery. Here, I don’t see anything definitive that screams forgery. Mind you, I’m not a handwriting expert, but I have hired a few and I have observed mine over the years. There are some notable differences between mine as a 30 year-old and now in my late 50’s. That could be even more so with Moore now being 70. At the very least, many more writing samples from when he was in his early 30’s would be necessary.

    • Anonymous

      November 14, 2017 3:51 pm at 3:51 pm

      Have you seen the color copy of the yearbook page? Everything after “Roy” is in a different color. When it is photo copied in black and white it all looks the same.

      • Anonymous

        November 15, 2017 12:21 pm at 12:21 pm

        Have you seen the video of the press conference? The blue ink that you’re talking about does NOT appear in the video of the yearbook, only in still shots, even though they zoom way in on the inscription. Maybe because it’s easier to photoshop the ink color to blue in a picture than on a video?

      • Dennis

        November 15, 2017 12:23 pm at 12:23 pm

        It looks the same in the press conference video as well ( Check out the 22:00 mark where they zoom WAY in on the signature and the ink all looks the same. The blue ink was added by photoshop.

        • SALLY Becker

          November 15, 2017 8:33 pm at 8:33 pm

          They can test that ink – that is why they want the yearbook.

        • Kudos

          November 16, 2017 2:56 am at 2:56 am

          Er no, CNN tweated the original out and its Blue. Also the DA was Roy’s assistant’s signature for her name… She only joined him in the 1990s. Its a forgery.

          • Dono

            November 16, 2017 8:57 am at 8:57 am

            “tweated” you guys are great lol

          • Steven Smith

            November 17, 2017 7:57 am at 7:57 am

            Just because she added the time and date after the written wish, does not imply he didn’t write the first part.

            You have not proven it’s a forgery.

    • Anonymous

      November 14, 2017 9:57 pm at 9:57 pm

      The o’s are a dead give away. I would agree with you except the o’s

    • BocomoTaxpayer

      November 15, 2017 3:14 am at 3:14 am

      Agree on needing older hand writing samples. That should not be hard since he was a DA, but evidently not at the time he was alleged to have written this note. However, there are multiple other problems with this note. It is clearly a forgery, at the very least part of it.

      • Mic

        November 15, 2017 5:58 am at 5:58 am

        Actually, he was never DA, but Deputy District Attorney. Another discrepancy.

        • Cassmish

          November 15, 2017 6:06 pm at 6:06 pm

          A little white lie to make himself sound better? A wish for the future? It’d look stupid to put DDA?

    • Kerry

      November 16, 2017 12:30 am at 12:30 am

      What’s dumb is that the “y” in Roy is different because he apparently started including his middle initial S, probably to differentiate his otherwise plain name a bit. So loop in the “y” in the later signature is intended also form an S. Did this blog author realize this? Probably. And I agree – there are much more similarities than meaningful differences. So this is just a blog and comment board of intellectual dishonesty by people who belong in America’s past, not our future. It’s no wonder that women don’t want to come forward on this stuff. Sheesh.

  4. MEB

    November 14, 2017 5:23 pm at 5:23 pm

    Moore signing the year book that came out of the end of the school year at Christmas is quite a feat!

    According to, she moved from Calif that year. Someone dial up Dan Rather to confirm that such magic is possible.

    • Theresa

      November 14, 2017 7:54 pm at 7:54 pm

      I’ve been saying how weird to get a year book in Dec. Also Moore graduated from Law School in 1977, he might have worked in the DA’s office but wasn’t a DA until later. It just doesn’t add up.

      • BocomoTaxpayer

        November 15, 2017 3:16 am at 3:16 am

        Yeah, one big stinkin setup. They’re not even good at it.

      • Steven Smith

        November 17, 2017 8:00 am at 8:00 am

        Oh like no deputy anything hasn’t lied and called himself the head honcho in order to impress a woman…

        • David H.

          November 18, 2017 12:50 pm at 12:50 pm

          wrong again Steven. the final proof of forgery.

          • Steven Smith

            November 22, 2017 5:56 pm at 5:56 pm

            The guy you linked starts off by saying he’s reporting on ‘the coup (d’état)’.

            I shut it off at that point.
            There’s no coup in the U.S. and this guy is a crackpot.

            Link someone credible.

  5. David H.

    November 14, 2017 5:36 pm at 5:36 pm

    Although your signature changes over time, The Line weights tend to remain the same, especially on the signature. Most People simplify their signature over time and age, the opposite is the case here, especially with the Y. Also if you look closely at the double O the line weights there are quite telling as is the formation of the O’s.
    For example: my “david has gone from being a well defined avi when I was younger to indistinguishable avi…To the point that my kids ask me why do you sign your name as “Dad”.

    The Printed text is without a doubt is different.

    My conclusion as a Pseudo expert, two different people signed.

    I Hope he has got some good lawyers that can run with this, and confirm this with unbiased expert analysis, thus exposing the fraud as “fake news”.

  6. xian

    November 14, 2017 8:27 pm at 8:27 pm

    creepy that you defend pedophilia this way.

    • BocomoTaxpayer

      November 15, 2017 3:19 am at 3:19 am

      How’s the air down there in the basement of the DNC?

    • Anti-deplorable

      November 15, 2017 5:32 pm at 5:32 pm

      Right?! They’re gross!

      • Anti-deplorable

        November 15, 2017 5:36 pm at 5:36 pm

        I’m talking about the creeps that defend this BIG creep!

        • Kudos

          November 16, 2017 2:59 am at 2:59 am

          Is this Doug Jones?

  7. Paul

    November 14, 2017 9:30 pm at 9:30 pm

    Innocent until proven guilty. Very odd timing on this indeed, no?

    • Double Standards

      November 16, 2017 6:21 am at 6:21 am

      I think that should be:

      Innocent until caught in the act, by multiple witnesses (with video, because witnesses can be bought), and livestreamed (because video can be faked), and published on a rightwing blog (because liberal news outlets can’t be trusted).

      Amazing burden of proof you lot are demanding now.

      When an vague accusation with zero evidence against a liberal is usually enough for you to get the pitchforks out.

      • Proud deplorable

        November 16, 2017 7:54 am at 7:54 am

        Imagine that, a liberal complaining about double standards??? Where is your outrage about Uranium one, and Hillary’s scrubbing her emails, etc, etc scandals.

        • Bill

          November 16, 2017 10:38 am at 10:38 am

          Who is Hillary?

  8. It's real

    November 14, 2017 9:31 pm at 9:31 pm

    Everyones handwriting changes throughout the years. Young adult to senior adult…the analysis is based on a persons personality and how that translates into their handwriting characteristics. Obviously his should’ve changed significantly, as does everyone else’s.

  9. Anonymous

    November 14, 2017 9:59 pm at 9:59 pm

    The o’s are a dead give away. I would agree with you except the o’s

  10. Anonymous

    November 14, 2017 10:24 pm at 10:24 pm

    I’d like to see the opinion of a handwriting expert, vs. that of a pundit columnist.


    November 15, 2017 12:44 am at 12:44 am

    It looks like a match to me. Maybe we Republicans should stop supporting #RAPISTS

    • BocomoTaxpayer

      November 15, 2017 3:23 am at 3:23 am

      Yeah we all know you DNC trolls are out there milking it. There ain’t no we, you DNC troll. Or were you referring to you precious (true rapist) bill Clinton.

      • Steven Smith

        November 17, 2017 8:02 am at 8:02 am

        Not everyone that has a problem with this votes Dem… There were 8 million votes cast in 2016 that didn’t go to either the Dems or the GOP.

  12. David H.

    November 15, 2017 7:20 am at 7:20 am

  13. Anonymous

    November 15, 2017 10:57 am at 10:57 am

    After seeing all the garbage that BOTH Republicans and Democrats have attempted to do in elections over the last two years, I really am skeptical of anything that the leadership asserts. I cannot believe that someone who has been assaulted would not tell anyone or seek justice. Heck, the printed handwriting on this yearbook looks like a woman’s handwriting. I’ve seen way too many shenanigans to give credence to anything Mitch McConnell and his ilk have to allege.

    • Dono

      November 16, 2017 8:58 am at 8:58 am

      L O L Literally all of the women told people. Perhaps you should just stop breathing? At least from your open mouth?

  14. dooberheim

    November 15, 2017 11:03 am at 11:03 am

    I know my signature has changed over 40 years. The signature and writing are surely similar enough to be convincing. Hardly debunked.

    It’s frightening that politics are so important to the rabid right that you’ll try anything to exonerate someone of obviously substandard morals.


    • Dale Holmgren

      November 15, 2017 7:31 pm at 7:31 pm

      dooberheim, I’m a libertarian who would otherwise support Moore, but I have to agree with you, the handwriting is close enough for me to be convinced that he signed it. I’m sure in his mind he would rationalize putting DA after it even if he was asst DA, because he wanted to project more power than he had. It’s like the old “The Office” joke about Dwight saying he was the assistant regional manager when his real title was assistant TO THE regional manager.

  15. Anonymous

    November 15, 2017 11:20 am at 11:20 am

    actually looks like a pretty good match.

    • Anonymous

      November 15, 2017 2:22 pm at 2:22 pm

      Can we find someone who went to school there during the timeframe and see when they were issued their yearbooks? I find it difficult that a yearbook would be issued in December. If there are photographs of the Baseball team in action then they would have to be from earlier in the same year which would make no sense as all yearbooks that I have ever seen have the Senior Class Pictures who would be graduating in that year already taken and posted. I would try to find one of the Seniors listed in that book to see when they got their yearbook.

  16. Pingback: The Roy Moore Story – txantimedia

  17. Anonymous

    November 15, 2017 3:03 pm at 3:03 pm

    In order to perform a proper handwriting comparison, you need to obtain samples of Roy Moore’s handwriting from 1977. The period between the questioned writing (yearbook) and the “Pledge” is 40 years. Handwriting can evolve over that period of time. Also, obtain exemplar handwriting and handprinting from 1977 to help identify or eliminate Roy Moore as the writer of the entire yearbook entry.

  18. Anti-deplorable

    November 15, 2017 5:30 pm at 5:30 pm

    You guys are still a bunch of deplorables!

  19. Wolfy

    November 15, 2017 7:01 pm at 7:01 pm

    It could not be more obvious this is a well orchestrated smear campaign. So many accusations just before the vote.

  20. Scott J Tepper

    November 15, 2017 7:31 pm at 7:31 pm

    Signartures are 40-years apart. If they are serious, ask for dating of ink. But they aren’t serious.

  21. Proud deplorable

    November 15, 2017 8:17 pm at 8:17 pm

    I see the shills and trolls are out in numbers…Must be they are scared of having Law enforcement in their ranks…Drain the swamp folks this is going to take a number of elections, and the swamp will lie cheat and steal to keep their power.

  22. Proud deplorable

    November 15, 2017 8:19 pm at 8:19 pm

    Anti deplorable,
    You have come into our safe space, you “hater”.

    (Sarcasm intended)

  23. Roy Moore

    November 15, 2017 8:27 pm at 8:27 pm

    Good job, junior handwriting analysts. Cookies for all of you. LOL

    • chris

      November 16, 2017 2:28 am at 2:28 am

      Hey Roy — Betcha thought you were Roger Moore!

      The thing is… there are many women accusers here and others to corroborate. It’s doubtful they are paid by the DNC and it’s doubtful they are all lying.

      Christmas Past has come back to haunt….but this story doesn’t have a happy ending for you.

  24. Somebody

    November 15, 2017 10:15 pm at 10:15 pm

    Another blatant discrepancy: Check out the capital M in “Merry Christmas” in the yearbook comment, and then compare it to the capital M in the supposed “Roy Moore” signature below- the M’s look nothing alike…

    Also, the yearbook comment has a very hard slant to the right with fairly tight spacing in the vowels… whereas the supposed Roy Moore signature and everything that comes after it has a more upright slant with large-spaced vowels. Obvious giveaway…

  25. Disconcerted content

    November 15, 2017 11:38 pm at 11:38 pm

    Oh the delusional sheep. Keep supporting pedos. You must have had a pretty crappy set of circumstances in life to bring yourself to support this guy.

    • Proud deplorable

      November 16, 2017 8:01 am at 8:01 am

      Just like the dnc and the Clinton’s, and the Hollywood elite. Oh and let’s not forget Pizzagate.

  26. Ari

    November 16, 2017 12:28 am at 12:28 am

    Handwriting analysis is a very weak science, and signatures change over time (especially over 40 years). It’s impossible to say whether this signature is from the same person. One thing is more certain: the date of the ink on the yearbook can be tested. If the ink is truly 40 years old, that would indicate strongly that it’s a real signature, because probably no one would have forged Moore’s siagnture in 1977. At any rate, if this is a forgery, it strikes me as a darn good one.

  27. Unknown Writer

    November 16, 2017 12:46 am at 12:46 am

    So where is the ink chemical analysis report and a DNA report if he touch that page his DNA is there. Without ink forensics you are only showing speculation. I am 52, and my handwriting is not the same as it was in any point in my life. What you have shown is very interesting and highly speculative. I also see you didn’t list your credentials to support you work, nor did you cite legal documents that he wrote over the years.

  28. Mike

    November 16, 2017 1:24 am at 1:24 am

    Bullshit. It’s a match.

  29. iamjudgingyou

    November 16, 2017 5:39 am at 5:39 am

    omg you guys are literally insane! Wow. Goes to show you see what you want to see. This isn’t the only pic out there. This one is probably a fake cause all the others are pretty much identical to each other. Bunch of pedophiles

  30. iamjudgingyou

    November 16, 2017 5:40 am at 5:40 am

    look at the Ms! And the loop at the Rs? The oore are basically the same. Give me a break! Holy hell not every thing is going to be perfect. It’s where they start and stop the stroke and they’re all identical. I can’t wait until you’re all proven wrong.

    • Proud deplorable

      November 16, 2017 8:13 am at 8:13 am

      Both parties are trying to bring down Roy Moore. The SWAMP vs Les Deplorables. This is the real battle going on. Time to clean the House and the senate of the swamp dwellers. This is where the real pedophiles are…Hiding behind accusations. Just like the worst human rights abusers come from within human rights organizations, or How the UN is responsible for more wars and atrocities than anyone. Quite simply this is Orwellian double speak. The Ones who scream the loudest are usually the ones guilty of the crimes.

  31. John

    November 16, 2017 7:15 am at 7:15 am

    This is a joke, right? A parody?

    *You* sign two documents 40 years apart and then see if some “expert” can’t come in and show how in one, the “o”s are different sizes or the “t” is crossed with a stroke that trends a bit up rather than a bit down. Y’all are so credulous this “expert” could probably convince you that it wasn’t you who signed your marriage license and you’ve been married to the wrong woman for decades.

    These are the same signatures. Sheesh.

  32. Paul

    November 16, 2017 7:29 am at 7:29 am

    While I tend towards this being yet another smear campaign, you really need to find some documents that Roy Moore signed in the 70s or 80s to see if his signature has changed or not.

    However, they are clearly *not* the same signatures.

    • Dono

      November 16, 2017 9:01 am at 9:01 am

      I like how you make your last sentence nonsensical via the first sentence. Great job! I def side with you, as you are clearly a genius. Thank you for blessing us with your immense knowledge.

  33. Dono

    November 16, 2017 8:55 am at 8:55 am

    I just want to thank you all for this humor. Your pathetic lives and posts on this site have brought me a great deal of joy this morning. Look at the way you grasp at straws. How desperate. How incredibly sad/humorous. The world is leaving you behind; that must suck. Please continue to support child molesters and “pwn libs”, it’s hilarious. Please also continue posting so inarticulately it’s like you don’t speak English. You’re giving us non-child rapists a lot to work with. I’ve been sharing this website w/ pals all morning (via screenshots though, don’t want to give the “Nation” more clicks obviously).


    L O L

  34. Dono

    November 16, 2017 9:07 am at 9:07 am

    Oh and yeah, good ole childfucker Roy DEF didn’t know where the Hickory House was! You see, Gadsen, Alabama is a bustling metropolis filled with exciting restaurants, so he obviously didn’t know about a BBQ spot that famously smokes pig for hours so that the entire block smells of BBQ being in town! Of course he didn’t! Duh. What, is he expected to have eyes AND a nose? Duh. We white men are famous for hating BBQ. Duh. Clearly, a sophisticated gentlemen such as Mr. Moore would have steered clear of a BBQ joint—I’m sure he was eating sustainably caught sushi! DUH!

    • Proud deplorable

      November 16, 2017 12:07 pm at 12:07 pm

      Hey DONO,
      All of a sudden the lefties cry JUSTICE, But when Pedogate was breaking you all were silent. Such Hypocrites.

      Oh, and then there was the rape of Juanita Broderick, and all the deaths surrounding the Clinton’s and the DNC. Where was Justice? You have no logical answer do you? What a waste, you should just call yourself “don’tknow”. Oh and BTW, your language shows your maturity level…GROW UP!

      • Steven Smith

        November 17, 2017 8:06 am at 8:06 am

        Except Pizzagate/Pedogate was a hoax by that idiot Alex Jones. He even apologized for it as reported by Veteran’s Today.

        • Proud deplorable

          November 17, 2017 9:24 am at 9:24 am

          Think again Steven Smith, Arrests are being made as we speak in this. It is just being hushed up by the media.

          • Steven Smith

            November 22, 2017 6:05 pm at 6:05 pm

            Alex Jones apologizes and assures us it was a false narrative here:

            Not sure where you are getting your information but it is wrong and you need to vet your news sources better.

            • David H.

              November 22, 2017 9:05 pm at 9:05 pm

              Alex Jones is a shill. My sources are from Local and national arrest records, particularly in LA and Hollywood. More are coming, and the whole ring which reaches into the Vatican, Governments, and Big Business is breaking. Pizzagate is a misnomer, that was used in the early breaking of the story due to the Podesta emails, and Comet Pizza. This is far bigger than a bunch of sick liberals, and reaches into both parties, and was used as a coercive tool by shadow Gov’t.

  35. B

    November 16, 2017 9:57 am at 9:57 am

    You do realize that the signatures would be roughly 40 years apart?? I think there are more similarities between the signatures, than differences. What is his excuse regarding the phone records???

  36. Steven D Visek

    November 16, 2017 10:49 am at 10:49 am

    I think the yearbook needs to be compared to Moore’s signature c. 1977. I know my own signature has changed quite a bit over the years, so comparing something he wrote in 2017 to something he may or may not have written in 1977 is not really compelling. Let’s find out the truth. I do find it troubling that the accuser did not feel she should mention he was the judge in her divorce. We need a lot more info here.

  37. David H.

    November 16, 2017 12:25 pm at 12:25 pm

    Moore accuser removes anti-Moore and anti-Trump posts from FB

  38. Pingback: CNN Blatantly Plays With Contrast To Make FAKE ROY MOORE SIGNATURE Seem More Authentic. RIDICULOUS. – The PATRIOTIC PERSPECTIVE

  39. Graham

    November 17, 2017 9:31 am at 9:31 am

    1. Instances 9-12 were most probably written by Nelson, after he signed the book. They’re clearly in a totally different hand to the rest of the inscription.

    2. When you’re looking for differences, it’s not difficult to find them. Look for similarities: there are plenty.

    3. I don’t know about your signature but mine has differences in it from moment to moment, nevermind when given 20+ years apart.

    4. A case in point: in your image of Moore’s handwriting, analyze the two places where he has printed his name. If you apply the same methodology, surely you’ll come to the conclusion they were written by different people.

    5. All Moore has to do is release a sample of his handwriting, which must be completely different from the main body of the inscription. Why doesn’t he do that? Focusing on the last segment is merely attempting to create a distraction and buy time.

  40. Proud deplorable

    November 17, 2017 10:20 am at 10:20 am

    Roy Moore accuser has been tied to the Hillary Clinton Campaign.

  41. Proud deplorable

    November 17, 2017 10:25 am at 10:25 am

    • Steven Smith

      November 22, 2017 6:06 pm at 6:06 pm

      WND is a known source of clickbait and outright fake news.

  42. David H.

    November 17, 2017 10:36 am at 10:36 am

    For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue hath muttered perverseness.
    None calleth for justice, nor any pleadeth for truth: they trust in vanity, and speak lies; they conceive mischief, and bring forth iniquity.
    They hatch cockatrice’ eggs, and weave the spider’s web: he that eateth of their eggs dieth, and that which is crushed breaketh out into a viper.
    Their webs shall not become garments, neither shall they cover themselves with their works: their works are works of iniquity, and the act of violence is in their hands.
    Their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed innocent blood: their thoughts are thoughts of iniquity; wasting and destruction are in their paths.

  43. Graham

    November 17, 2017 1:41 pm at 1:41 pm

    I’ve now found some examples of his actual handwriting, and they match the writing in the inscription.

    As for the comparison of signatures, you can find as many differences in any two samples of his signature as you can in the one in the yearbook.

    It’s not looking good for Roy.

    All photos and evidence here:

  44. Fraser Crest

    November 19, 2017 8:07 pm at 8:07 pm

    It is not a forgery, and the analysis is inaccurate. That IS his signature and that IS his handwriting. The same writing instrument and pressure is consistent on the entire yearbook inscription. His signature compared to other signatures by him are the same. There is an interview with an FBI handwriting expert who explains how signatures and handwriting changes over the years, and that your signature is never exactly the same all the time- there are variations depending on countless factors. And Moore himself said that he asked underage girl’s parents if he could “date” them… So, he did date underage girls– so why is it so hard to believe the stories of these women. If, after listening to the woman with the yearbook story, and your senses are not flooded with affirmation that she is telling the truth, then you might be spiritually weak and morally bankrupt. Reading Moore’s Wikipedia file about the history of his career… His views are un-American. Every citizen has the same inalienable rights– you cannot exclude a group because YOU think your bible tells you to hate them and persecute them or kill them– there is nothing “Christian” in that belief. All citizens are entitled to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness; all are entitled to Equal Treatment and Equal Justice Under the Law– Moore doesn’t think so. It is unconstitutional to make Christianity the “official religion” of the nation, and to teach bible study in school– whose interpretation of the Bible? Why would you force kids who are NOT Christian to study the Bible in school? That is NOT the country our Founding Fathers created. They were equally concerned with religion (any religion) having too much influence over government because many people who immigrated from Europe did so to escape religious persecution (and even torture and murder) because of the Vatican and also because of some of the Churches of the Reformation– burning people at the stake in the name of your god was not something our Founding Fathers wanted for this country; and every single culture, past and present, where religion is the rule of law people are persecuted and suffer and there is no real freedom. Roy Moore’s twisted views of the Constitution and of Christianity should give anyone pause. He is man obsessed with the lives of others, but don’t you dare question him? Seriously, it’s time for people to read the Beatitudes (aka the Sermon on the Mount) to see how Christ wants Christians to behave.

  45. David H.

    November 19, 2017 10:28 pm at 10:28 pm

    You wrote: “Why would you force kids who are NOT Christian to study the Bible in school?” Why Do you want to keep them from hearing the Word of God? Are you a book burner? Are you afraid they may discover something known as the TRUTH there? You see the real history of the founding of this country is that of breaking free from religious and worldly institutions that did not allow for people to read books, and the Bible was kept in darkness by a church elite that would not translate it into the common tongue. So the Masses were kept from the Liberty of the Word of God, and were kept in bondage to the church/state. So, which is more “enlightening”, to keep the Bible away from our youth or to let them read it publically and decide for themselves?

    As for Roy Moore, the documents have been proven a forgery, The attack is falling apart, and Roy Moore has been raising record amounts of donations for his campaign. So You need to stop watching the fake news and get the real news…This is another fake news nothing burger.

  46. Jason

    November 21, 2017 1:14 pm at 1:14 pm

    Discrepancies mean next to nothing when they were made so far apart. You’re comparing two signatures- one from 1977 and one from 2017. Of course they’re going to look different. Hell, examine a series of anyone’s signatures done in a row. You’ll clearly see they’re not all 100% identical. This is grasping at straws.

  47. David H.

    November 21, 2017 1:42 pm at 1:42 pm

    Yes, Jason, the general trend is to simplification of the signature. We do not see that here and it points to forgery.
    I used the example above, where my signature has gone from a legible “David” to one that my kids say looks like “”Dad”. But this example above shows the opposite, especially on the “y”. This proves the yearbook is a forgery, not to mention the D.A. are the initials of the secretary who has worked for Roy for 30 years. Watch the video below.

  48. Chris Christie's Belt

    November 22, 2017 1:37 am at 1:37 am

    GOP = Greedy Old Pedophiles

  49. Joe Sixpack

    November 22, 2017 3:49 pm at 3:49 pm

    As a legal expert, I found it amusing that pro-Moore idiots attempt to conduct a handwriting analysis. You morons should stick to PizzaGate investigations. And, by the way, Moore was removed from the Alabama Supreme Court twice for ignoring the U.S. Supreme Court and the rule of law. You traitors make us patriots sick.

  50. David H.

    November 22, 2017 9:19 pm at 9:19 pm

    Joe Sixpack is trying to impress us with his credentials as a “legal expert”. Who cares, its experts like you that have gotten this country into the mess it in now. You see us common deplorable folk have common sense on our side, not your high brow “expertise” which cannot even figure out which came first, the chicken or the egg. As For Moore ignoring the rulings in question, That is why we admire him and defend him, because had I been in his position, I would have done the same. That is because I believe in a higher authority than the Government, and Our constitutional rights are endowed by our Creator…which is not Washington DC, but the God of Heaven. HE Says Marriage is to be between a man and a woman, so His authority supercedes the SCOTUS.

    Ask Yourself this, if the SCOTUS were to rule that pedophilia is legal, would you prostitute your daughter to them? That is how sickening and offensive the SCOTUS ruling on gay marriage is to us “common folk” who fear the Lord.

  51. Pingback: Allegations Against Judge Roy Moore Proven False – The Red Pill

  52. Pingback: Handwriting Analysis Can’t Exonerate Roy Moore - DC Weekly News and Politics

  53. Tara V

    December 4, 2017 6:21 pm at 6:21 pm

    LOL. Signatures change all the time, especially over decades. My signature changes depending on my mood, even. If anyone put it to test, they would probably claim all of my signatures are forged.

    • David H.

      December 6, 2017 11:53 am at 11:53 am

      Old News, Roy Moore is leading in the polls. His accusers have been discredited as frauds, and once again, the libtards underestimate the deplorables.

    • Scott H

      December 8, 2017 4:33 am at 4:33 am

      Whole premise of comparing signatures 40 years apart is flawed. Sorry you had to go through all this trouble, but it doesn’t prove a thing. Moving on.

  54. Alan

    December 8, 2017 2:39 pm at 2:39 pm

    This is really interesting. Do you, by chance, have legitimate signatures for Judge Moore in 1977? That would be very, very interesting to see!!!

    Nice work-

  55. David H.

    December 11, 2017 6:48 pm at 6:48 pm

    Now false accuser Gloria Aldred is going after Trump….Got busted falsely accusing Moore, now after Trump…OOPS

  56. Jim Acosta

    December 15, 2017 3:15 am at 3:15 am

    The signatures are from the same hand. Very obvious. Roy was kicked to the curb in one of the most red states in America and rightly so. Good riddance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

To Top