Liberals are quick to attack Judge Roy More for possibly dating a 19-year-old adult, but will they denounce LGBT icon Harvey Milk, who had sexual relationships with minors at age 33? Milk was a serial statutory rapist.
One of his victims was a 16-year-old boy. Milk managed to convince the boy that he should runaway from his Maryland home and join him in San Fransico. The boy was named Jack Galen McKinley. The legal age of consent in California was 18, and remains unchanged.
In 1982, the official biography of Harvey Milk was published called The Mayor of Castro Street. The book was written by homosexual author Randy Shilts. In the book, Shilts wrote of Milk’s “relationship” with the McKinley boy:
Sixteen-year-old McKinley was looking for some kind of father figure. At 33, Milk was launching a new life, though he could hardly have imagined the unlikely direction toward which his new lover would pull him.
Years later, McKinley committed suicide.
Milk took advantage of a boy who desperately sought a “father figure,” to use as a sex toy. Liberal democrats have managed to release U.S. Milk postage stamps, organize government subsidized Milk celebrations, and even a name a USNS Naval Ship after this rapist.
Who do they characterize Judge Roy Moore as being a sexual deviant for potentially dating a 19-year-old, but proudly exalt and exonerate a serial statutory rapist?
MUST READ: Widow of ‘American Sniper’ Chris Kyle issues statement to NFL.
Taya Kyle, the widow of ‘American Sniper’ Chris Kyle, released a letter directed to the NFL via Facebook. Her message pertains to the present decision of National Football League players to kneel during the national anthem.
You were doing your part to bring people together and heal the world. That’s really how healing works. We heal by loving each other and leading by example; showing people what is possible when we love each other just as we are and not only recognize our differences but celebrate them and look at how we can use them together to make us jointly better than our separate parts. You were doing your part celebrating each other based on skills, talent and a joint vision without regard to color and religion.
You were doing your part and we were doing ours. We showed up cheering and groaning together to [sic] as one. We talked in the concession lines and commiserated and celebrated our team together. Did it ever occur to you that you and we were already a mix of backgrounds, races and religions? We were already living the dream you want, right in front of you.
Your desire to focus on division and anger has shattered what many people loved most about the sport. Football was really a metaphor for our ideal world –different backgrounds, talents, and histories actually made us one big team with one big goal – to do well, to win, TOGETHER.
You are asking us to abandon what we loved about togetherness and make choices of division. Will we stand with you? Will we stand with our flag? What does it mean? What does it mean if we buy a ticket or NFL gear? What does it mean if we don’t? It is the polar opposite of the easy togetherness we once loved in football.
It was simple – we loved you and you loved us – with all of our races, religions and different backgrounds. Simplicity in a crazy world was pretty awesome.
You dear NFL, have taken that. You have lost me here.
If you ever want to get off your knees and get to work on building bridges, let me know. I have found screaming about the problems in service marriages or even standing in silence in front of them, hasn’t healed even one of them. On the other hand, funding the Chris Kyle Frog Foundation, building a team and rolling up my sleeves to get in the trenches during my ‘off time’ -volunteering there outside of my paying jobs – has proven to make real change.
You have a lot of strong guys, I am sure in the off season a lot of them could build some pretty big bridges if they care enough to do the hard work. That would involve getting off their knees and getting to work though. I can do it while I raise two kids as their only parent and work through the greatest pain of my life, let’s see if they can do it for the issues they say they care so much about.
Go Longhorns and Sic ‘Em …
In 2013, Chris Kyle and Chad Littlefield were fatally shot. Taya Kyle is now a single mother, raising two children.
Eleven U.S. states to drop suit over transgender bathroom order
Eleven U.S. states have agreed to drop a lawsuit against an Obama administration order for transgender students to use bathrooms of their choice after the measure was revoked by President Donald Trump, a court filing showed on Thursday.
In a filing in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the U.S. Justice Department said the states, led by Texas, had agreed to drop the lawsuit, and it was dropping its appeal against a federal judge’s August stay on the Obama directive.
In their suit in May, the states said Democratic President Barack Obama’s administration overstepped its authority by ordering public schools to let transgender students use bathrooms matching their gender identity, rather than their birth gender, or risk losing federal funding.
Obama officials had said that barring students from such bathrooms violated Title IX, the federal law that forbids sex discrimination in education.
But the directive enraged conservatives who say federal civil rights protections cover biological sex, not gender identity. Obama was succeeded by Trump, a Republican, when he left office in January.
Texas was joined in the lawsuit by Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The Arizona Department of Education, Maine Republican Governor Paul LePage and two school districts also were parties to the suit.
A federal judge in August barred adoption of the order during the hearing of the case. The Justice Department appealed the stay, saying it should only apply to the states challenging the order.
Last week, the Trump administration rescinded the order, leaving states and school boards to decide how to accommodate transgender students.
Other lawsuits about the rights of transgender students are being heard in the courts.
The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on March 28 addressing the question of whether the Gloucester County School Board in Virginia can block a female-born transgender student from using the boys’ bathroom.
(Reporting by Ian Simpson; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)
You can march, you can cry, but Trump is still President.
Last Saturday, dozens of liberals infested our local Main Street to oppose the policies of President Donald Trump. Calling their event “The Human Rights March,” protesters gathered in objection to Trump’s Immigration Order, the wall, and other miscellaneous bumper sticker slogans they could pull out of their beanies.
Freedom of Speech should be honored for all people, as granted in the Constitution. While everyone has the right to express their opinions, using that freedom to misrepresent the views of your opponents is not only deceptive but desperate.
Trump supporters have been misrepresented as being racists, bigots, sexists and xenophobes. Rather than understanding the actual beliefs of conservatives, most heavily opinionated progressives form their own misinterpretations of the foundations behind such principles. According to the liberal playbook, if you can discredit your opponent by portraying them as a bigot, actually formulating a valid argument isn’t necessary.
By the left, Trump’s immigration order is being recognized as a “Muslim Ban.” According to a 2015 Pew Research Report, approximately 13 percent of the world’s Muslim population lives in the countries where Trump made the decision to withhold visas. This means that 87 percent of the world’s Muslim population are still allowed to migrate into the United States. This was not a Muslim ban. This temporary limitation on visas has been simply implemented on countries that consist of a large number of radicalized individuals, who desire America’s destruction. Until the civilized can be identified separate from the radicalized and the vetting process is improved, the order would remain in effect for national security protections. This is similar to the limitation that Democratic President Jimmy Carter placed on Iran during his tenure. It is also quite humorous that while liberals have often claimed that “America should not be the world’s police,” they feel that we should be the word’s Motel 6.
On the topic of illegal immigration: in many cases, legal Mexican immigrants come to the United States to flee Mexico’s drug violence. Without a protective barrier (A.K.A The Trump Wall), Mexico’s crime problem will also become an issue for the United States. Legal Mexican immigrants, who travel to America for a better life, will find the problems (that once mainly existed in their native country) have followed them. Liberals, do they not deserve to be protected? Do legal Mexican immigrants not deserve an assurance that life in America will never become like the low quality of life they had in Mexico? Do they not deserve a wall of protection to separate them from the cartels they sought to escape? You are not only fighting to weaken America’s national security, but to demolish the safety of legal Mexican-American citizens.
Rather than recognizing this as a safety concern, you have turned it into a racial issue. You have ignored facts, common sense and all reason in the name of social justice reform. The reality is that there are bad people in this world, and Mexico has a crime problem. If Mexico did not have a crime problem, truckloads of people would not be trying to escape.
Of course, we should allow immigration from Mexico but only legal immigration. Conservatives are not anti-immigrant, but rather favor immigrants going through the proper process to become American citizens. By being processed, we can identify the criminals from the desired, law-abiding migrants. In order to do this, we must have a secure boarder with a “big beautiful door,” so we can keep track of those who enter and exit. This is solely to protect our people, both American-born-citizens and registered Mexican-American citizens.
Liberals, you are also condoning Hispanic illegal immigrants to partake in borderline slavery. Time and time again, progressives claim that “undocumented immigrants are doing the jobs that American citizens don’t want to do.” Do you think that is right? How are they supposed to advance? In many of these cases, illegal immigrants are involved in hard laboring jobs and work for under minimum wage. Though their work is worth more than their pay, they are unable to report it. They have no grounds to legally demand a higher wage, because they are not legally here.
Until the boarder is secure, there will always be illegal immigrants; there will always be undocumented people taken advantage of. Rather than continuing the traditional Democratic support of involuntary servitude, reject inequitable servitude of Mexican undocumented immigrants by fighting to secure the border and embracing legal immigration.
Exposed3 months ago
VINDICATED—IT’S FORGED: Over 12 discrepancies in Roy Moore’s alleged yearbook signature.
Culture4 months ago
MAKING KIDS GAY? Disney to begin indoctrinating and exposing children to homosexuality.
Caiden Cowger11 months ago
COWGER: Tomi Lahren is not a conservative and supports the genocide of unborn children.
Censorship11 months ago
Riley J. Dennis: His disturbing control over the Internet.
Censorship12 months ago
CENSORSHIP: Twitter suspends account of conservative YouTuber Hunter Avallone.
SCOTUS4 months ago
Judge rules to remove WWI cross memorial, because it symbolizes Christianity.
Exposed4 months ago
Roy Moore accuser worked for Clinton and Obama campaigns. Endorsed opponent Doug Jones.
Cowger Radio11 months ago
WATCH: Feinstein struggles to understand role of the Constitution and Supreme Court in Gorsuch hearing.