Connect with us


Au Revoir, Ted Cruz

George Lujack




Ted Cruz recently criticized Donald Trump for having “New York values,” and in doing so he delivered himself a self-inflicted wound that his campaign will not be able to recover from. With those comments, insulting as they were to all New Yorker’s everywhere – who share or do not share the New York values that Ted Cruz was speaking of, Cruz has alienated himself as someone who, as president or vice president, would not be a representative leader for all the people, but only for the people who share his values.

Screen shot 2016-01-18 at 9.53.12 AMWhen asked the question at the GOP Fox Business News debate on January 14, 2016, about his comments on “New York values,” Cruz did his best to backtrack and explain those values as being socially liberal, pro abortion, pro gay marriage, etc. The problem with Cruz’s explanation is that in declaring Trump has “New York values,” he insulted every man and woman in America that either lives in New York, or was once from New York, as sharing those liberal New York values, simply because they happened to be born in New York or because they once lived and worked in New York for a period of time in their life.

Screen shot 2016-01-18 at 9.55.20 AMTed Cruz now has a better chance of becoming Prime Minister of Canada, than he does for becoming President or Vice President of the United States. Trump brought up Cruz’s eligibility issue, as Cruz was born in Canada and was not naturally born in the United States, as a legitimate concern and that Cruz should have gotten this issue resolved and certified by a court before running for president and having this potential looming issue clouding his candidacy or that of another’s campaign if he were chosen to be their vice president running mate on the republican ticket.

Screen shot 2016-01-18 at 10.12.59 AMIn the wake of Cruz’s “New York values” comments and his Canadian birther issue, there is simply no way that Donald Trump will choose Ted Cruz to be his VP running mate, should Trump go on and become the GOP nominee for president.

Who will Trump choose to be his vice presidential running mate? Of all the candidates running for president, a pragmatic Trump might choose Marco Rubio. This would solidify and unite the GOP ticket, appeasing establishment republicans who would be represented by Rubio. Trump is a bold person however, and most often is not a pragmatist. That being the case, Trump may very well choose someone who is an accomplished individual, but not necessarily as well known politically; someone that shares his American values.

As they say in the French quarters of Canada, “Au revoir, Ted Cruz.”

Cruz Ship

George Lujack serves as the Managing Editor for Cowger Nation. Lujack is an independent Messianic Minister, an opinionated conservative political and religious writer, and a retired NY City police officer.

Continue Reading


  1. Sue

    January 18, 2016 12:18 pm at 12:18 pm

    Wow. Im shocked Caden that you a conservative locally here in a bible belt state would even allow this garbage to be introduced. Aa one who lived in New York previously and coming from very many conservatives in and from New York as well as many democras their who share Ted Cruz’s thought process regarding the political values that New York state of mind polititions have. I have been from the beginning of your digital media a fan how ever it is far from conservative or even evangelical to see your digital media now seemingly promoting DT. I for one will no longer be a subscriber here in N.C

    • Patrick

      January 29, 2016 8:21 pm at 8:21 pm

      Who cares, your Delusional.

  2. David H.

    January 18, 2016 3:09 pm at 3:09 pm

  3. susan sanderson

    January 18, 2016 4:04 pm at 4:04 pm

    I hesitate to even check in here anymore, but here goes. Sue…run for your life from this site if you do not agree 100% with George “New York Values” Lujack and his support for Donald Trump! I agree with your assessment of the way things have degraded here at the Cowger Nation…it’s sad! In fact after this post I will delete this site from my favorites and not look for it again.

    • Patrick

      January 29, 2016 8:23 pm at 8:23 pm

      Susan while you were out to Lunch, your Proctologist phoned and she found your head.

  4. George Lujack

    George Lujack

    January 18, 2016 4:29 pm at 4:29 pm

    Sue and Susan Sanderson, are you perhaps letting your emotions for Ted Cruz run away with you and letting your anti-Trump sentiments overwhelm your logical minds? I have provided analysis of Cruz’s “New York values” statement and the fallout that he will receive from it. You think I am wrong? I will bet each of you a NY bagel that I am correct in that Ted Cruz will neither be the GOP presidential nominee, nor will he be Trump’s VP pick.

    • susan sanderson

      January 18, 2016 4:52 pm at 4:52 pm

      George, I’ll accept your bet. Cruz will win Iowa by a huuuuge margin! Then Trump will crawl back into his narcissistic tower and we won’t hear from the loser again. You know how to contact me. I’ll be looking forward to that bagel!

      • George Lujack

        George Lujack

        January 18, 2016 4:56 pm at 4:56 pm

        Bet is on.

      • Jane Goodwin

        January 25, 2016 11:31 am at 11:31 am

        I agree that Trump will not pick Cruz for VP. And Cruz will NOT be President. And Canada won’t want him to run for office up there either. Good Bye Cruz.

  5. David H.

    January 18, 2016 6:45 pm at 6:45 pm

    I Miss them NY bagels….and them reubens too.

  6. Jane Goodwin

    January 25, 2016 11:28 am at 11:28 am

    I agree about Cruz. But I absolutely DO NOT agree about the best remaining choice being Rubio. Rubio is even worse than Cruz, if that’s possible. I would NOT be happy if Trump chose Rubio as VP. There are good men out there that he can pick. I am sure he will make a good choice when the time comes. I don’t think even Canada would want Cruz. And We don’t want Curz, Rubio or Carson either. However, in a country of 350M people, and 1000s of us praying that Trump will be wise in his decisions, he will know who to choose.

  7. Silvio Di Bartolomei

    January 28, 2016 2:01 pm at 2:01 pm

    I will subscribe to replace Sue. Like it or not, that was a fair analysis of what has happened with Cruz’s campaign.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


WATCH: Roy Moore releases statement, still not willing to give up on Alabama U.S. Senate race.

Caiden Cowger



MONTGOMERY, AL — Judge Roy Moore is still not giving up on his Alabama senate race. The Republican candidate expressed on Wednesday that he is still waiting on the military ballots, to see if the election will be close enough for a recount.

Continue Reading



George Lujack




Despite repeated calls from Democrats, establishment Republicans, the mainstream media, and other leftist political operatives demanding Judge Roy Moore withdraw his nomination from the upcoming U.S. Senate election in Alabama, he has stood strong and has refused to step down. Moore’s refusal has his political opponents in a panicked frenzy not seen since the nomination and election of President Donald J. Trump.

What have Moore’s opponents accused him of? A crime? No. Moore is accused of initiating contact, termed “a sexual encounter,” with a 14-year-old girl when he was 32. Likewise, he is accused of similar such events as dating an assortment of 16, 17, and 19 year old women. DATING! That’s right, dating and with parental consent. Oh, but he may have “touched” or “kissed” one of them, so say his accusers! These events allegedly occurred 38-years ago, when Moore, now 70, was 32! Talk about due process and stretching the statute of limitations to new limits!

Moore, a former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, has vowed to stay in the race and has called many of the accusations against him “completely false.”

Even if these allegations were true, they are not crimes. The Alabama legal Age of Consent for sexual contact is 16 years old. Thirty-one states have set their age of consent at 16, the lowest age of consent in any state. Are we going to make up laws to lock up men, if while on a date with women, a man “inappropriately touches” a young woman, but she rejects his advances and he stops? Is this attempted rape according to feminists? Does the same standard apply if a woman touches a man’s chest or lap? Can this then be reported as unwanted “inappropriate touching,” which can irreparably destroy a man’s life going forward?

You may as well lock up all the men in the country and / or disqualify them from running from public office if making the slightest physical advance towards a woman, or the accusation of doing so, becomes an unforgivable crime. Oh, I suppose it is, but only if they are Christian-values Republicans. More, no pun intended, on that later…

Ivanka Trump told the Associated Press that she believes the stories of the women who have accused Republican U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore of pursuing them as teenagers. Ivanka said, “There’s a ‘special place’ in hell for people who prey on children,” regarding the Moore accusations, and further stated,”I’ve yet to see a valid explanation and I have no reason to doubt the victims’ accounts.”

Ivanka, darling, now that your daddy is president, I am sure it is your wish to be loved by the establishment who hate both you and your father. I’m sure you think a great way for you to do this is for you to join them in condemning Moore. Ivanka, speaking of your daddy President Donald J. Trump, did you know that the same kind of accusers vilified your father, but you asked us to trust you, because you knew your father loved women? Ivanka, did you know that your daddy Donald is 71, is on his third marriage, and his current wife Melania is 47-years-old and Donald Trump is 24 years older than her? Did you know the age difference between a 32-year-old man and a 16-year-old woman is 16-years, which is less of an age discrepancy than Donald and Melania have? Ivanka, did you know that your daddy Donald was caught on tape bragging about “grabbing women’s pussies?”

Ivanka, you claim that you see no reason to ever disbelieve a woman who accused Judge Roy Moore of sexual misconduct / inappropriate touching. Can you really be that dumb and naive? I have a viable reason and explanation for you. Politics. Lying liberal women used by Democrat operatives to bring down the candidacy of a Republican U.S. Senate candidate who they loathe, Judge Roy Moore.

The National Republican Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee have pulled their financial support from Moore’s campaign. As the Republican establishment turned its back on Moore, the people have risen up and donations have poured in for Roy Moore. Many Senate Republicans have urged Moore to drop his bid, whether or not he is guilty of anything. Moore and his campaign have made it clear that this isn’t what he intends to do, and have questioned the legitimacy of his signature in his accusers’ high school yearbook. Moore has called the allegations fake news in an attempt to dismantle his campaign.

Democrat operatives love using forgeries, such as the seemingly obvious forgery of Roy Moore’s signature in his accuser’s yearbook. Liberals vehemently defend such forgeries, such as was the case with Obama’s forged birth certificate, then tactically vilify anyone who would question the authenticity of the forgery, as with Obama’s birth certificate, as a “birther.” In this case of Roy Moore, liberals rail against anyone who would question the integrity of young (now old) women who would never lie about allegations of sexual misconduct. Many on the political left have been quick to say that Moore’s young accusers (now old and some openly Democrat supporters) would never lie. The dangerous belief that young women would never fabricate a lie once led to the execution of 20 persons, five additional deaths, and hundreds of arrests and imprisonments in the Salem witch trials of Massachusetts in 1692-1693. Roy Moore is likewise facing a Washington establishment witch hunt.

Bill Clinton had oral sex performed on him by an intern during his presidency, but liberals and the mainstream media saw no reason to disqualify him and remove him from office. Republicans were roundly criticized for impeaching a sitting president, who not only took advantage of an impressionable young intern, but then lied under oath about it. Furthermore, the mainstream media routinely turned a deaf ear to the numerous groping and rape accusations made against Bill Clinton.

This brings us to the real reason Judge Roy Moore is under attack. No one cares about tales of Roy Moore dating, kissing, and touching legal aged young women. Moore is a Christian-values candidate who unashamedly governs and legislates according to his conscious and faith. He has stood against the U.S. Supreme Court, defending Alabama’s Constitution and laws against the imposition of gay marriage imposed upon the people of Alabama. The pro-homosexual establishment government and mainstream media, who are at war with traditional Judeo-Christian morality, will use any means necessary to try to destroy Roy Moore, an honorable candidate for U.S. Senate who stands for the values that they abhor, as they continue on their maddening self-destructive quest to transform America into a atheistic secular society, ridding the nation of all its Judeo-Christian values and foundations.

Continue Reading


The Lynching Of Judge Roy Moore– What The Heck Happened To Due Process?

Joe Dan Gorman




40 year old allegations and no due process. What country is this?  And this is being allowed to impact the balance of OUR US Senate?

This is EXACTLY why DUE PROCESS -and not MOB JUSTICE- was put in the US Constitution by our Founding Fathers.

I’m not at all surprised by Swamp creatures – BUT SEAN HANNITY?  Shame on Sean for giving the Judge Moore a 24 hour ultimatum.
We cannot let them win.

Continue Reading

Most Popular