Donald Trump has quite famously been all over the map on social and political issues. He once was adamantly pro-choice; now he is pro-life with exceptions. He once criticized Mitt Romney for turning off the Latino and Asian populations with his talk about self-deportation. Now he wants to seal the border, round up all illegal aliens, and ship them home.
He voted for Barack Obama, and was so proud of his vote he Tweeted it out. Then he deleted the Tweet. He was a registered Democrat until 2009. Now he’s not.
He once said glowing things about Hillary Clinton and donated to the Clinton foundation. Now she’s the worst Secretary of State in American history. He once said glowing things about nationalized health care. Now he doesn’t (although he still supports single payer on the campaign trail).
Until about five years ago, he gave most of his money to Democrats. Now he doesn’t. He once said the economy seems to do better under Democrats. Now he doesn’t. He once supported a massive one-time tax on wealth. Now he doesn’t.
I do not doubt the sincerity of Trump’s current positions on any of these issues. He seems genuinely and passionately committed to these positions. Today.
Just as he was genuinely and passionately committed to his former positions. Yesterday.
His passion and energy and bull-doggedness in refusing to back down on issues where he has taken a stand is why he continues to be at or near the top of every poll. He has made illegal immigration and the threat of Islamic fundamentalism front burner issues in the political debate, and his message is resonating across the board with Americans of every stripe.
HIs numbers skyrocketed to 41% in the latest national poll from Monmouth University, and is at 38% in the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll, nearly lapping his nearest competitor, Ted Cruz, three times.
But there is something dangerously unpredictable about Trump. How do we explain these abrupt and enormous changes of course? What is guiding him? Where is he getting his guidance on moral and political questions?
Conservatives are looking for candidates who are guided by eternal and abiding principles that come from God. For this reason among others, the leading pro-faith, pro-family, pro-life leaders in the nation have decided to back Ted Cruz.
Donald Trump, on the other hand, seems to be guided by shifting and ephemeral principles that come from Donald Trump.
He still supports the use of eminent domain to take private property from citizens against their will to be handed over to developers such as his own self. He once tried to take a widow’s house to use for a parking lot at one of his casinos. Speaking of which, he has made boatloads of money off casino gambling, and was the first casino owner to include a strip club complete with modified lap dancing.
His own passion seems to be what drives him, and the strength of his passion seems to be what validates whatever position he holds at the time. The more strongly he feels something, the more certain he is that he is right.
But this is not how conservatives process things, it’s the way liberals process things. Liberalism is based on pure emotion. It is based entirely on feelings and the strength of those feelings.
To be a good, card-carrying liberal, you don’t need to think, you only need to feel. If a liberal is offended emotionally, he is absolutely convinced that he is right and whoever offended him is wrong and must be silenced and punished. The strength of his own emotional reaction is all the validation he needs. Facts, reason, and logic are immaterial. If he feels something this strongly, he knows he must be right.
In my view, Trump happens to be right about the need to build a security fence along our southern border and to suspend Islamic immigration. So naturally I agree with him on those issues. But because Trump is driven by passion rather than reason, this seems to be more a happy coincidence than anything else.
There is something mercurial about Trump that ought to prompt caution on the part of conservatives. If Trump’s passion, which delights us today, should shift, he could say something tomorrow that would alarm us. And if does the same thing after he’s elected president, it would not just be alarming, it could be dangerous. It is impossible to predict how widely his eventual positions will vary from the positions he has taken today.
A state-of-the-art GPS unit takes its positioning data from a satellite in the heavens. Donald Trump seems to be taking his positioning data from the earth-bound center of his own mind. Conservative voters beware.
WATCH: Roy Moore releases statement, still not willing to give up on Alabama U.S. Senate race.
MONTGOMERY, AL — Judge Roy Moore is still not giving up on his Alabama senate race. The Republican candidate expressed on Wednesday that he is still waiting on the military ballots, to see if the election will be close enough for a recount.
ROY MOORE, STANDING STRONG
Despite repeated calls from Democrats, establishment Republicans, the mainstream media, and other leftist political operatives demanding Judge Roy Moore withdraw his nomination from the upcoming U.S. Senate election in Alabama, he has stood strong and has refused to step down. Moore’s refusal has his political opponents in a panicked frenzy not seen since the nomination and election of President Donald J. Trump.
What have Moore’s opponents accused him of? A crime? No. Moore is accused of initiating contact, termed “a sexual encounter,” with a 14-year-old girl when he was 32. Likewise, he is accused of similar such events as dating an assortment of 16, 17, and 19 year old women. DATING! That’s right, dating and with parental consent. Oh, but he may have “touched” or “kissed” one of them, so say his accusers! These events allegedly occurred 38-years ago, when Moore, now 70, was 32! Talk about due process and stretching the statute of limitations to new limits!
Even if these allegations were true, they are not crimes. The Alabama legal Age of Consent for sexual contact is 16 years old. Thirty-one states have set their age of consent at 16, the lowest age of consent in any state. Are we going to make up laws to lock up men, if while on a date with women, a man “inappropriately touches” a young woman, but she rejects his advances and he stops? Is this attempted rape according to feminists? Does the same standard apply if a woman touches a man’s chest or lap? Can this then be reported as unwanted “inappropriate touching,” which can irreparably destroy a man’s life going forward?
You may as well lock up all the men in the country and / or disqualify them from running from public office if making the slightest physical advance towards a woman, or the accusation of doing so, becomes an unforgivable crime. Oh, I suppose it is, but only if they are Christian-values Republicans. More, no pun intended, on that later…
Ivanka Trump told the Associated Press that she believes the stories of the women who have accused Republican U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore of pursuing them as teenagers. Ivanka said, “There’s a ‘special place’ in hell for people who prey on children,” regarding the Moore accusations, and further stated,”I’ve yet to see a valid explanation and I have no reason to doubt the victims’ accounts.”
Ivanka, darling, now that your daddy is president, I am sure it is your wish to be loved by the establishment who hate both you and your father. I’m sure you think a great way for you to do this is for you to join them in condemning Moore. Ivanka, speaking of your daddy President Donald J. Trump, did you know that the same kind of accusers vilified your father, but you asked us to trust you, because you knew your father loved women? Ivanka, did you know that your daddy Donald is 71, is on his third marriage, and his current wife Melania is 47-years-old and Donald Trump is 24 years older than her? Did you know the age difference between a 32-year-old man and a 16-year-old woman is 16-years, which is less of an age discrepancy than Donald and Melania have? Ivanka, did you know that your daddy Donald was caught on tape bragging about “grabbing women’s pussies?”
Ivanka, you claim that you see no reason to ever disbelieve a woman who accused Judge Roy Moore of sexual misconduct / inappropriate touching. Can you really be that dumb and naive? I have a viable reason and explanation for you. Politics. Lying liberal women used by Democrat operatives to bring down the candidacy of a Republican U.S. Senate candidate who they loathe, Judge Roy Moore.
The National Republican Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee have pulled their financial support from Moore’s campaign. As the Republican establishment turned its back on Moore, the people have risen up and donations have poured in for Roy Moore. Many Senate Republicans have urged Moore to drop his bid, whether or not he is guilty of anything. Moore and his campaign have made it clear that this isn’t what he intends to do, and have questioned the legitimacy of his signature in his accusers’ high school yearbook. Moore has called the allegations fake news in an attempt to dismantle his campaign.
Democrat operatives love using forgeries, such as the seemingly obvious forgery of Roy Moore’s signature in his accuser’s yearbook. Liberals vehemently defend such forgeries, such as was the case with Obama’s forged birth certificate, then tactically vilify anyone who would question the authenticity of the forgery, as with Obama’s birth certificate, as a “birther.” In this case of Roy Moore, liberals rail against anyone who would question the integrity of young (now old) women who would never lie about allegations of sexual misconduct. Many on the political left have been quick to say that Moore’s young accusers (now old and some openly Democrat supporters) would never lie. The dangerous belief that young women would never fabricate a lie once led to the execution of 20 persons, five additional deaths, and hundreds of arrests and imprisonments in the Salem witch trials of Massachusetts in 1692-1693. Roy Moore is likewise facing a Washington establishment witch hunt.
Bill Clinton had oral sex performed on him by an intern during his presidency, but liberals and the mainstream media saw no reason to disqualify him and remove him from office. Republicans were roundly criticized for impeaching a sitting president, who not only took advantage of an impressionable young intern, but then lied under oath about it. Furthermore, the mainstream media routinely turned a deaf ear to the numerous groping and rape accusations made against Bill Clinton.
This brings us to the real reason Judge Roy Moore is under attack. No one cares about tales of Roy Moore dating, kissing, and touching legal aged young women. Moore is a Christian-values candidate who unashamedly governs and legislates according to his conscious and faith. He has stood against the U.S. Supreme Court, defending Alabama’s Constitution and laws against the imposition of gay marriage imposed upon the people of Alabama. The pro-homosexual establishment government and mainstream media, who are at war with traditional Judeo-Christian morality, will use any means necessary to try to destroy Roy Moore, an honorable candidate for U.S. Senate who stands for the values that they abhor, as they continue on their maddening self-destructive quest to transform America into a atheistic secular society, ridding the nation of all its Judeo-Christian values and foundations.
The Lynching Of Judge Roy Moore– What The Heck Happened To Due Process?
WRITTEN, CREATED, ENGINEERED, AND PRODUCED BY JOE DAN GORMAN
40 year old allegations and no due process. What country is this? And this is being allowed to impact the balance of OUR US Senate?
This is EXACTLY why DUE PROCESS -and not MOB JUSTICE- was put in the US Constitution by our Founding Fathers.
I’m not at all surprised by Swamp creatures – BUT SEAN HANNITY? Shame on Sean for giving the Judge Moore a 24 hour ultimatum.
We cannot let them win.
Exposed3 months ago
VINDICATED—IT’S FORGED: Over 12 discrepancies in Roy Moore’s alleged yearbook signature.
Culture4 months ago
MAKING KIDS GAY? Disney to begin indoctrinating and exposing children to homosexuality.
Caiden Cowger11 months ago
COWGER: Tomi Lahren is not a conservative and supports the genocide of unborn children.
Censorship11 months ago
Riley J. Dennis: His disturbing control over the Internet.
Censorship12 months ago
CENSORSHIP: Twitter suspends account of conservative YouTuber Hunter Avallone.
SCOTUS4 months ago
Judge rules to remove WWI cross memorial, because it symbolizes Christianity.
Exposed4 months ago
Roy Moore accuser worked for Clinton and Obama campaigns. Endorsed opponent Doug Jones.
Cowger Radio11 months ago
WATCH: Feinstein struggles to understand role of the Constitution and Supreme Court in Gorsuch hearing.