Connect with us

Election

BEN CARSON; Clear Loser of the CNN Debate and Unelectable as President of the United States

George Lujack

Published

on

WRITTEN BY: GEORGE LUJACK

Ben Carson was the stand-out loser of the 2nd GOP 2016 presidential debate hosted by CNN. Chris Christie was a close runner up, as he wants to conduct an all out assault on medical and recreational marijuana users, using taxpayer money to incarcerate non-violent pot smokers and use the federal government to trample the 10 Amendment to the Constitution, violating States rights on the issue.

There was no knockout blow delivered to Carson by Trump or any of the other GOP candidates in the field. Carson was critically wounded by his own self-inflicted statements. When Carson was asked how he would have responded after the 9-11-2001 terrorist attacks on America’s homeland, Carson spoke about a letter he wrote to then President Bush, that America should NOT respond militarily to the 9-11-2001 terrorist attacks on American soil…

“I didn’t suggest that nothing be done. What I suggested to President Bush is to be Kennedyesque in the sense that when the Russians got ahead of us in the space race, what we did is use the bully pulpit to galvanize everybody; business, industry, academia; behind a national goal to put a man on the moon and bring him back safely. I said, you can do the same kind of thing. Declare that within five to ten years we will become petroleum independent. The moderate Arab states would have been so concerned about that, they would have turned over Osama bin Laden and anyone else you wanted on a silver platter within two weeks.” (153:05 video)
-Ben Carson 09/16/2015 at the CNN GOP Debate 

A post-debate poll confirmed that Ben Carson was the clear loser of the debate. Before the debate, Trump lead the field at 33% with Carson in second place at 17%. Post-debate numbers have Trump at 36%, Carson at 12%, Fiorina at 10% and Rubio at 9%.

Perhaps Dr. Carson’s hippocratic oath interferes with his ability to discern when the use of American military force is justified and necessary. If Ben Carson truly believes that the United States should not have responded militarily after the 9-11-2001 terrorist attacks on the homeland, then it is almost a certainty that he would never use the U.S. military under any circumstances. All the talk in the world would have never resulted in the Arab states going to war against Al-Qaeda and them capturing Osama bin Laden and handing him over to the United States.

Ben Carson’s dovish military stance would be an invitation for terrorists and other rough regimes to attack the United States at home and abroad, knowing that a President Carson would never respond with American military force. Carson’s extreme dovish position makes him unelectable as president of the United States and unfit to be America’s Commander-in-Chief.

George Lujack serves as the Managing Editor for Cowger Nation. Lujack is an independent Messianic Minister, an opinionated conservative political and religious writer, and a retired NY City police officer.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. David H.

    September 20, 2015 11:25 am at 11:25 am

    The next challenge for Trump will come from women. This will determine if trump can beat Hillary, with the onslaught of the media behind Fiorina (Nothing but praise from the establishment media).

    This will be the real test, as the women in the republican party will have their emotions preyed upon.

    If he can pass this next test, he will likely be the nominee.
    Iron sharpens Iron….

  2. Paul Farrell

    September 20, 2015 7:23 pm at 7:23 pm

    George Lujak,
    Please explain to me and others how going after a country which had nothing to do woth the 9/11 attack is the right thing to do. The 19 hijackers were not Iraqi, they were Wahabi Muslims from Saudi Arabia. As far as attacking the whole country of Afganistan, the camps were in one or two areas, and bin Laden retreated to the Tora Bora mountains with his hoarde. We did not have to go and take over the whole country. That is an absolute fact.
    The Bushes and the Saudi Royal Family of which bin Laden was a member, are thick as thieves and there was no way Bush was gonna do anything to corral bin Laden. Heck it was his daddy that recruited bin Laden in the first palce and then renegged on a promise to help rebuild Afganistan. Too bad you do not know your history of the Middle East since the end of WWII.

    • George Lujack

      George Lujack

      September 21, 2015 7:51 am at 7:51 am

      I didn’t defend the Iraqi invasion in the article; I defended the use of military force after a terrorist assault on the homeland. I assure you, if the United States too absolutely no military action, the public would have grown impatient and went berserk. Bombing a few training camps would have been insufficient.

      • David H.

        September 21, 2015 4:42 pm at 4:42 pm

        Scott walker out of race.

  3. melvin polatnick

    September 24, 2015 5:14 pm at 5:14 pm

    Carson does not have the charisma of Obama, it is a miracle he is even rated in the polls. Expect Carson to fade fast and never heard from again.

  4. Tim Tremblay

    November 1, 2015 10:01 pm at 10:01 pm

    “Oil” and the whole hierarchy of the petroleum industry is the reason for the whole stinking mess.

    The reason Saudi Arabia has not been overtaken by foreign powers is because they’re all in bed with them. And the Saudi’s are funding both enemies and allies.

    You may remember when the oil derricks were set on fire in Iraq it didn’t take too long to put them out, experts were sent from various countries to remedy the situation.

    Whenever a viable alternative for the internal combustion engine comes along it very quickly disappears. Wake up you fools, it’s the Petro-Companies who dictate foreign policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Election

WATCH: Roy Moore releases statement, still not willing to give up on Alabama U.S. Senate race.

Caiden Cowger

Published

on

MONTGOMERY, AL — Judge Roy Moore is still not giving up on his Alabama senate race. The Republican candidate expressed on Wednesday that he is still waiting on the military ballots, to see if the election will be close enough for a recount.

Continue Reading

Election

ROY MOORE, STANDING STRONG

George Lujack

Published

on

 

Despite repeated calls from Democrats, establishment Republicans, the mainstream media, and other leftist political operatives demanding Judge Roy Moore withdraw his nomination from the upcoming U.S. Senate election in Alabama, he has stood strong and has refused to step down. Moore’s refusal has his political opponents in a panicked frenzy not seen since the nomination and election of President Donald J. Trump.

What have Moore’s opponents accused him of? A crime? No. Moore is accused of initiating contact, termed “a sexual encounter,” with a 14-year-old girl when he was 32. Likewise, he is accused of similar such events as dating an assortment of 16, 17, and 19 year old women. DATING! That’s right, dating and with parental consent. Oh, but he may have “touched” or “kissed” one of them, so say his accusers! These events allegedly occurred 38-years ago, when Moore, now 70, was 32! Talk about due process and stretching the statute of limitations to new limits!

Moore, a former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, has vowed to stay in the race and has called many of the accusations against him “completely false.”

Even if these allegations were true, they are not crimes. The Alabama legal Age of Consent for sexual contact is 16 years old. Thirty-one states have set their age of consent at 16, the lowest age of consent in any state. Are we going to make up laws to lock up men, if while on a date with women, a man “inappropriately touches” a young woman, but she rejects his advances and he stops? Is this attempted rape according to feminists? Does the same standard apply if a woman touches a man’s chest or lap? Can this then be reported as unwanted “inappropriate touching,” which can irreparably destroy a man’s life going forward?

You may as well lock up all the men in the country and / or disqualify them from running from public office if making the slightest physical advance towards a woman, or the accusation of doing so, becomes an unforgivable crime. Oh, I suppose it is, but only if they are Christian-values Republicans. More, no pun intended, on that later…

Ivanka Trump told the Associated Press that she believes the stories of the women who have accused Republican U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore of pursuing them as teenagers. Ivanka said, “There’s a ‘special place’ in hell for people who prey on children,” regarding the Moore accusations, and further stated,”I’ve yet to see a valid explanation and I have no reason to doubt the victims’ accounts.”

Ivanka, darling, now that your daddy is president, I am sure it is your wish to be loved by the establishment who hate both you and your father. I’m sure you think a great way for you to do this is for you to join them in condemning Moore. Ivanka, speaking of your daddy President Donald J. Trump, did you know that the same kind of accusers vilified your father, but you asked us to trust you, because you knew your father loved women? Ivanka, did you know that your daddy Donald is 71, is on his third marriage, and his current wife Melania is 47-years-old and Donald Trump is 24 years older than her? Did you know the age difference between a 32-year-old man and a 16-year-old woman is 16-years, which is less of an age discrepancy than Donald and Melania have? Ivanka, did you know that your daddy Donald was caught on tape bragging about “grabbing women’s pussies?”

Ivanka, you claim that you see no reason to ever disbelieve a woman who accused Judge Roy Moore of sexual misconduct / inappropriate touching. Can you really be that dumb and naive? I have a viable reason and explanation for you. Politics. Lying liberal women used by Democrat operatives to bring down the candidacy of a Republican U.S. Senate candidate who they loathe, Judge Roy Moore.

The National Republican Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee have pulled their financial support from Moore’s campaign. As the Republican establishment turned its back on Moore, the people have risen up and donations have poured in for Roy Moore. Many Senate Republicans have urged Moore to drop his bid, whether or not he is guilty of anything. Moore and his campaign have made it clear that this isn’t what he intends to do, and have questioned the legitimacy of his signature in his accusers’ high school yearbook. Moore has called the allegations fake news in an attempt to dismantle his campaign.

Democrat operatives love using forgeries, such as the seemingly obvious forgery of Roy Moore’s signature in his accuser’s yearbook. Liberals vehemently defend such forgeries, such as was the case with Obama’s forged birth certificate, then tactically vilify anyone who would question the authenticity of the forgery, as with Obama’s birth certificate, as a “birther.” In this case of Roy Moore, liberals rail against anyone who would question the integrity of young (now old) women who would never lie about allegations of sexual misconduct. Many on the political left have been quick to say that Moore’s young accusers (now old and some openly Democrat supporters) would never lie. The dangerous belief that young women would never fabricate a lie once led to the execution of 20 persons, five additional deaths, and hundreds of arrests and imprisonments in the Salem witch trials of Massachusetts in 1692-1693. Roy Moore is likewise facing a Washington establishment witch hunt.

Bill Clinton had oral sex performed on him by an intern during his presidency, but liberals and the mainstream media saw no reason to disqualify him and remove him from office. Republicans were roundly criticized for impeaching a sitting president, who not only took advantage of an impressionable young intern, but then lied under oath about it. Furthermore, the mainstream media routinely turned a deaf ear to the numerous groping and rape accusations made against Bill Clinton.

This brings us to the real reason Judge Roy Moore is under attack. No one cares about tales of Roy Moore dating, kissing, and touching legal aged young women. Moore is a Christian-values candidate who unashamedly governs and legislates according to his conscious and faith. He has stood against the U.S. Supreme Court, defending Alabama’s Constitution and laws against the imposition of gay marriage imposed upon the people of Alabama. The pro-homosexual establishment government and mainstream media, who are at war with traditional Judeo-Christian morality, will use any means necessary to try to destroy Roy Moore, an honorable candidate for U.S. Senate who stands for the values that they abhor, as they continue on their maddening self-destructive quest to transform America into a atheistic secular society, ridding the nation of all its Judeo-Christian values and foundations.

Continue Reading

Election

The Lynching Of Judge Roy Moore– What The Heck Happened To Due Process?

Joe Dan Gorman

Published

on

WRITTEN, CREATED, ENGINEERED, AND PRODUCED BY JOE DAN GORMAN

40 year old allegations and no due process. What country is this?  And this is being allowed to impact the balance of OUR US Senate?

This is EXACTLY why DUE PROCESS -and not MOB JUSTICE- was put in the US Constitution by our Founding Fathers.

I’m not at all surprised by Swamp creatures – BUT SEAN HANNITY?  Shame on Sean for giving the Judge Moore a 24 hour ultimatum.
We cannot let them win.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Most Popular