Connect with us

Culture

Proof: people aren’t “born that way”

Bryan Fischer

Published

on

An article by the Daily Mail’s “science editor,” Fiona Macrae, proves that people choose their sexual orientation and can change it if they wish. And she doesn’t even seem to realize how guilty she is of shocking sexual heresy.

One of the enduring myths about homosexuality is that people are “born that way,” and that it is impossible to change one’s sexual orientation. It’s considered a form of cruelty and self-loathing even to try.

Therapy to help teenagers redirect the orientation of their sexual energies has been made a professional crime in any number of states now. If a counselor in one of those states tries to help a young man or woman tormented with unwanted same-sex attraction, his career will be over.

And then here comes this bombshell, not from the cultural editor of the Daily Mail, but its science editor. Even the headline gives the game away (emphasis mine throughout): “Rise of the flexi-sexual female: Women are ‘more likely to be bisexual than men’ – and change their minds about their sexuality.”

Well, if women can “change their minds about their sexuality,” it’s game, set, and match. Sexual orientation is not fixed and immutable after all.

And the writer makes it inadvertently clear that men can change their orientation as well. The fact that women are “more likely to change their minds about sexuality” than men only means that men can do it too.

The research was done by Elizabeth McClintock of the University of Notre Dame, so this can’t be passed off as the work of some right wing nut job, which is the knee jerk reaction of most sexual anarchists to assertions like this.

Says McClintock, “This indicates that women’s sexuality may be more flexible and adaptive than men’s.” It bears repeating: sexual orientation is “flexible and adaptive” for both men and women. It looks like folks aren’t “born that way” after all.

McClintock analyzed the results of a study conducted in the U.S. in which respondents (5,000 women and 4,000 men) were asked about their sexual proclivities three times, at age 16, 22 and 28.

McClintock, in a presentation to the American Sociological Association (not a part of the vast right-wing conspiracy), declared that women “were…three times more likely to change their minds about their sexuality in their 20s.” In other words, the younger you are, the easier it is to redirect your sexual orientation.

This means, for one thing, that efforts to ban reparative therapy are entirely wrongheaded. We’re always being told that such therapy can’t work, since people can’t help how they were born, and is actually harmful to the patient. Well, this research proves that people can change their orientation all on their own. It stands to reason that experienced, professional help can simply get them there quicker.

Angelina Jolie is Exhibit A in this article. She acknowledges going through a lesbian phase, and admits that she might have married her lesbian lover, Japanese-American model Jenny Shimizu, if circumstances had been different. But then she adjusted her sexual orientation, met and married Brad Pitt, and here they are, heterosexually married with six kids in tow.

Sexual orientation is not an immutable trait that people can’t do anything about. Somebody needs to alert the Supreme Court, because their decision legalizing sodomy-based marriage was based entirely on this falsehood.

Do not let them lie to you. Bottom line: sexual orientation is not fixed and immutable. It can be re-directed from homosexuality and lesbiansim to normative heterosexuality. If you doubt me, just ask Angelina Jolie.

Bryan Fischer is a senior columnist for Cowger Nation, and the radio host of Focal Point, where he provides expertise on a wide range of public policy topics.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. selena

    August 31, 2015 11:29 pm at 11:29 pm

    In case you’re hitched, you’ll most likely perceive huge numbers of these relationship issues. Be that as it may, what may shock you is the way effortlessly they can be settled.http://reviewxpro.com/how-to-avoid-divorce-and-save-the-marriage/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Culture

THE MOST STUPID THING IN SPORTS/ATHLETICS TODAY: Transgender-women vs. actual women.

Jimmy Zulz

Published

on

I think that women are starting to react and push back a bit. Finally. This is easily the most stupid thing in sports, and it boggles my mind that the people running these events haven’t put a stop to it already. And that thing is: transgender women are competing with God-made women.

I will guarantee you that there are going to be some male athletes (not all and probably not most), who are unable to compete and win in male competition, so they think hey, this is a great way to be more successful in (fill in the blank).  So, they go through the surgeries and whatever is necessary to compete as a woman and… voila! Now, they are up at the top in competition.

I heard a possibly transitioning-man on sports talk radio (I’m sorry they’re even talking about this) call in and he said, “If the man is going to go through the hardship and painful surgery to become a woman, women in that sport are just going to have to suck it up and realize she’s every bit as much a woman as they all are.”

And that’s the problem: he-now-she is much more than the God-made women in that sport, so he-now-she has an enormous advantage. Strength and ability will likely be more than most women can compete with. It’s absolute bull-crap.

The fact that some women athletes are speaking up is why they were talking about it on the radio. At some point, these God-made women are going to have to DEMAND that trans-she-males will have to have their own division, because putting men in competition with women is flat out unfair. I can’t imagine why this wasn’t done immediately.

Continue Reading

Culture

MAKING KIDS GAY? Disney to begin indoctrinating and exposing children to homosexuality.

Caiden Cowger

Published

on

Tonight, Disney Channel is airing an episode of Andi Mack, featuring its “first gay coming-out story.” This episode will mark the primer of the show’s second season, and is directed at children ages 10 and up.

Andi’s friend Cyrus Goodman (played by Joshua Rush) will begin his coming-out journey as a homosexual. Disney is using a 15-year-old boy, Joshua Rush, as an instrument to promote the homosexual lifestyle, while also exposing Rush to homosexual behavior in the process. Disney Channel is actively participating in the corruption of a minor.

It is expected that this plot-line could potentially lead to underage, teenage boys participating in same-sex kissing. This perversion will broadcast to millions of teenagers and children across America, exposing them to homosexual behavior. Such programming can cause confusion in minors, leading them to question their sexual preference, starting at the young age of just 10 years old.

“‘Andi Mack’ is a story about ‘tweens’ figuring out who they are,” Disney Channel expressed in a statement earlier this week. “Everyone involved in the show takes great care in ensuring that it’s appropriate for all audiences and sends a powerful message about inclusion and respect for humanity.”

The story line also gained praise from the GLAAD LGBT advocacy organization.

“With more and more young people coming out as LGBTQ, Andi Mack is reflecting the lives and lived experiences of so many LGBTQ youth around the country,” the organization’s president and CEO, Sarah Kate Ellis, released in a statement. “Television reflects the real life world and today that includes LGBTQ youth who deserve to see their lives depicted on their favorite shows. Disney has been a leader in LGBTQ inclusion and there are so many young people who will be excited to see Cyrus’ story unfold.”

The first episode airs October 27, 2017, at 8:00p | ET.

Continue Reading

Culture

THE CO-ED SCOUTS OF AMERICA

George Lujack

Published

on

On October 11, 2017, the Boy Scouts of America’s board of directors unanimously agreed to allow girls to join the Cub Scouts and Boy Scouts, giving girls the opportunity to earn the highest rank of Eagle Scout.

“I’m saying that the Boy Scouts have a standard. You must be a biological boy to be a Boy Scout. You have to be a boy to be a Boy Scout.”

“Where is that written though?”

“In the name, ‘Boy’ Scouts.”
– Ben Shapiro

Not anymore, Ben. This is 2017 and this is the new progressive Boy Scouts of America, who announced that they will begin to allow girls to join their ranks.

What Ben Shapiro said however, is nonetheless true, “You must be a biological boy to be a Boy Scout. You have to be a boy to be a Boy Scout.” If the ‘Boy’ Scouts do not change the name of their organization to “The Scouts,” or something similar, the organization will be taking a stand in the cultural war on the side of liberal progressives over the issue of gender neutrality. Any girl who states, “I am a ‘Boy’ Scout,” will be unwittingly stating that she is a boy, even if she is a genuine scout, the type of girl who likes the scouting activities that the Boy Scouts provide and are involved in.

Although the Boy Scouts’ board of directors voted to allow girls to join their ranks, they were within their First Amendment Constitutionally protected right of freedom of association to deny them entry.

The Girl Scouts of America could wind up being a casualty of the Boy Scouts’ decision to recruit girls into their membership rolls. Back in August, the head of the Girl Scouts accused the Boy Scouts organization of a “covert campaign to recruit girls,” as a way to boost declining membership. If girls across America decide to join the Boy Scouts, en masse, it could mean the end of the Girl Scouts as a viable organization.

Other than the issue of a girl calling herself a “‘Boy’ Scout,” conservatives should not be overly concerned with co-ed scouting. Boys and girls have enjoyed a long history of sharing summer camp activities together in America, without becoming gender neutral. Boys will still be boys and girls will still be girls (most of the time).

“Girls will be boys and boys will be girls it’s a mixed up muddled up shook up world…”
– The Kinks, “Lola

However, the gender-neutral minded cultural elites would like to redefine the gender roles of boys and girls in society and confuse the gender identity of boys and girls, when possible, which is the real issue that is rightfully alarming to most Americans. Progressives have long sought to corrupt and neuter the Boy Scouts through social engineering, as they have likewise done in other institutions, and have now succeeded in doing so.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Most Popular