Connect with us


Ireland: Sodomy-Based Marriage Now Legal

Caiden Cowger



IRELAND — With 62 percent of the vote, Ireland voted to legalize marriage between individuals who are sexually attracted to people of their own sex.

As a result, this makes Ireland the first country to legalize same-sex marriage by a vote of the people. One of the arguments used by the media was that by granting gay marriages, it would establish equality in the country. This is not true.

In 2010, homosexuals were given the ability to have civil partnerships. This gave them equal rights. Their goal in this referendum was to destroy marriage, because they want to change the cultural norm so their disgusting perversion of sex is accepted.

Caiden Cowger is the owner and Editor-in-Chief of Cowger Nation. Cowger also serves as the radio host of The Caiden Cowger Program. In 2015, he was named as being the "'Youngest' Syndicated Talk Personality" in the United States.

Continue Reading


  1. Dan

    May 23, 2015 3:34 pm at 3:34 pm

    If one of the most Christian nations on Earth can pass gay marriage then it looks like the tip of your iceberg is melting Caiden.

    • Caiden Cowger

      Caiden Cowger

      May 23, 2015 4:26 pm at 4:26 pm

      It obviously wasn’t a Christian nation.

      • Anonymous

        May 25, 2015 10:18 pm at 10:18 pm

        youre a fucking idiot fag

  2. Dan

    May 23, 2015 4:35 pm at 4:35 pm

    Someone doesn’t know their international history.

  3. Steve

    May 24, 2015 2:22 am at 2:22 am

    For one, this was about equality, because the previous civil union statute did not afford same-sex couples equal rights to marriage. This makes me want to ask, would you be okay with civil unions if they weren’t called marriage and afforded equal rights? Anyways, aren’t you glad this was done democratically? I mean, conservatives whine about courts imposing judicial activism, but this was done super-democratically. Also, sodomy-based marriage was not legalized. I highly doubt same-sex couples base their marriage off of sodomy, in the same way that heterosexual couples do not base their marriage off of sex. All this constitutional adoption did was ensure that sex discrimination cannot exist in the granting of marriage licenses in Ireland. For example, if Susan wants to marry Cheryl, she cannot be deprived of that right for no other reason than the fact that she is a woman. If she were, that would be, in my opinion, an unconstitutional sex-based classification.

  4. The One

    May 24, 2015 9:19 pm at 9:19 pm

    You writing this dumb article just proves that you don’t support democracy. Well done, idiot.

  5. Renate

    May 28, 2015 7:02 pm at 7:02 pm

    This is not about equality. It is about normalizing sodomy. What homosexuals do is not sex. So how can they be “married”. I feel sorry for Ireland’s children, Christians, or anyone that opposes this perverted behavior. This vote does not help homosexuals, but it will hurt them. The homosexual life style is destructive, not loving. For people to normalize this behavior thinking it will equalize things haven’t really dealt with militant homosexuals who will make sure everyone that does not agree with them will suffer, get fined, jailed, and take sensitivity ( i.e. re-education camp) training. I know this is coming to America, but with America it will be 9 people that decide, not the populace. Protect your children. God help us all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Muslim inbreeding dragging Britain back to the 19th century

Bryan Fischer



Britain is seeing an alarming spike in birth defects, defects they have not seen since the end of the 19th century. There is a one-word explanation: Islam.

The resurgence of these birth defects is due to the prevalence of first cousin marriages in the Muslim community, particularly among immigrants from Pakistan. Such marriages are legal in Britain, to be sure, but by the late 1800s the risk of birth defects in the children of such unions had become so common and so widely known that the practice virtually vanished. (First cousin marriages, which are not specifically banned in Scripture, are illegal in about half the states in the U.S., which is the only country in which such marriages are prohibited anywhere.)

An article in the London Telegraph (which doesn’t use the word “Islam” anywhere in the article, and waits til the 12th paragraph to mention the word “Pakistani”) opens this way (emphasis mine):

Bradford coroner Mark Hinchliffe spoke out after being told how two-year-old Hamza Rehman died as a result of a brain disorder.

An inquest heard how the child suffered from daily fits and vomiting as a result of a condition probably arising from his parents being too closely related.

The boy’s father, Abdul, broke down and wept as the court heard that if he had lived he would have suffered severe learning difficulties.

Through a translator, Mr Rehman, from Bradford, West Yorks, explained that he and his wife, Rozina, were first cousins.

“We were very anxious whether to have more children,” he told the court. “We have recently had another baby with the same problems again.”

After expressing his “profound sympathy to the family” Mr Hinchliffe said the cause of death “arose as a direct consequence of the neurological developmental disorder.”

He said the family had lost another child through a similar disorder and a third child born had now “presented with difficulties.”

Recording a verdict of death by natural causes, Mr Hinchliffe added: “On the face of it this case highlights a cultural and religious issue relating to first cousin marriages and the potential risk of medical difficulty that some medical experts say can result from such unions.”

Pakistani parents in Britain are responsible for 3.4% of all births in England, yet shockingly account for 30% of all children born with recessive gene disorders. This is because the acceptability of first-cousin marriages is engrained in Muslim culture. In Bradford, 55% of all Pakistanis are married to their first cousins.

Even though Pakistanis represent just 15% of Bradford’s population, Bradford has the second highest number of infant deaths in England, and Pakistani parents are 13 times more likely than the general  population to have children with birth disorders. (This according to a study by St. Luke’s Hospital in Bradford.)

According to The Guardian, intermarriage between first cousins doubles the risk that children will be born with birth defects. The difficulty of purging this harmful practice will be especially difficult because it is an established religious as well as cultural practice in the Muslim community.

In Norway, the incidence of first-cousin Pakistani unions is slowly declining, but this is due only to a concerted campaign to inform Muslims of the risk.

There are no quick fixes, which means the U.K. will continue to labor under this burden for decades to come. With Britain’s socialized medicine, the excessive costs of providing lifetime care for patients with birth defects will fall entirely on British taxpayers. And this doesn’t account for the enormous social costs associated with providing education and employment opportunities for this demographic group.

In the worldwide Muslim community, first-cousin marriage rates routinely run as high as 50%, while the rate is about 1% in Europe and 0.2% in the U.S. With unrestrained Muslim immigration the trend du jour, Europe is about to be hit with a medical tsunami which would be entirely avoidable with sensible immigration policies. Alas, the Western world is likely to awaken only after it is too late.

Winston Churchill presciently said 120 years ago, “[T]he influence of the religion (i.e., Islam) paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.” (Emphasis mine.)

Islam is pulling British society in a backwards direction. Apart from a spirited revival of the Christian faith and some severe, Donald-Trump style restrictions on Muslim immigration, the United States will be next.

Continue Reading



George Lujack



On Wednesday, December 06, 2017, President Donald Trump declared that the United States officially recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. President Trump also indicated that the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv would be moved to Jerusalem.

Israel had declared Jerusalem as its capital since its founding in 1948. Previous U.S. presidents have remained neutral on recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, to appease Israel’s Arab neighbors, but Trump declared that every sovereign nation has the right to declare the location of its own capital.


There are a few notable observations of Scripture prophetic significance concerning the historic announcement by President Trump recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital

2017 represents a jubilee (50-year) time period since Israel’s Six Day War of 1967, and before that another jubilee (50-year) time period since the Balfour Declaration of 1917 by the British government announcing support for a homeland for the Jewish people in the land of Israel.

President Trump’s Jerusalem announcement on December 6th was declared just six days before Hanukkah, the 12-day Feast of Dedication (John 10:22), which begins December 12th.

The United States’ official recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital brings Israel one political step closer to fulfilling the rebuilding of their Third Temple, on the Temple Mount site, where the Dome on the Rock and Al Aqsa Mosques currently sit. In the decades to come these mosques will come down and be relocated by Muslims. Israel’s Third Temple will be erected on its Temple Mount site and Scripture prophecy will be fulfilled, as it is written (2 Thessalonians 2:4; Revelation 11:1).

Israel’s Temple Mount site, where the Dome of the Rock Mosque (gold dome), the Al Aqsa Mosque (silver dome), and other minor Muslim shrines currently sit.


The Temple Institute of Jerusalem has the plans and resources already in place to construct Israel’s Third Temple. This golden menorah, encased in security glass near the Temple Mount site, will be placed inside the Temple after it is rebuilt.


Continue Reading


TRUMP TO UN ON NORTH KOREA: We will “totally destroy” them if they attack us or our allies.

Caiden Cowger



On Tuesday, President Donald Trump addressed the United Nation, discussing one of the most recent conflicts pertaining to U.S. national security. President Trump discussed the North Korea nuclearization situation, and threatened to “totally destroy” them if the United States is forced to defend itself or its allies.

“The United States has great strength and patience,” Trump continued, “but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea.”

He also told the assembly that the country is operated by a “depraved regime.”

The President called upon other nations to work together, striving to cease doing business with and isolate the country, until it decides to discontinue its nuclear program and aggressive threats.

Continue Reading

Most Popular