Culture

Why We Should Fight Same-Sex Marriage

If we are looking to craft enlightened public policy on the issue of same-sex marriage, we need look no further than its impact on children.

The best in social research has repeatedly revealed that children fare worse in same-sex environments than in environments in which they are raised by their biological parents who are married to each other.

If we care about children, the public policy question on same-sex marriage answers itself. We should reject same-sex marriage because we love children and want them to grow up in optimal nurturing environments.

More confirmation comes from a new study which has been published in the most recent edition of the British Journal of Education, Society, and Behavioural Science. According to University of Texas sociologist Mark Regnerus, it “appears to be the largest (study) yet on the matter of same-sex households and children’s emotional outcomes.”

As Regnerus writes,

Results reveal that, on eight out of twelve psychometric measures, the risk of clinical emotional problems, developmental problems, or use of mental health treatment services is nearly double among those with same-sex parents when contrasted with children of opposite-sex parents. The estimate of serious child emotional problems in children with same-sex parents is 17 percent, compared with 7 percent among opposite-sex parents, after adjusting for age, race, gender, and parent’s education and income. Rates of ADHD were higher as well—15.5 compared to 7.1 percent. The same is true for learning disabilities: 14.1 vs. 8 percent.

The study’s author concluded that of all the possible explanations (residential stability, stigma, bullying) for these pronounced differences, “biological parentage…accounted for nearly all of the variation in emotional problems.”

Writes Regnerus, “[T]here is no equivalent replacement for the enduring gift to a child that a married biological mother and father offer. It’s no guarantee of success. It’s not always possible. But the odds of emotional struggle at least double without it.”

While the homosexual lobby wants us all to believe otherwise, a careful examination of the best available research demonstrates that every population-based survey reveals the same thing. “Published research employing the New Family Structures Study (NFSS), the ECLS (Early Childhood Longitudinal Study), the US Census (ACS), the Canadian Census, and now the NHIS all reveal a comparable basic narrative, namely, that children who grow up with a married mother and father fare best at face value.”

But the social sciences have become so corrupt that there is no longer any pretense of an objective search for truth. Results are twisted, bent, contorted and misrepresented to serve the interests of the homosexual lobby rather than the truth.

One other salient factor emerges from the research: the comparative instability of same-sex unions. Children need, indeed crave, stability in their home environment. They are enormously vulnerable and utterly dependent on the adults in their world for a sense of security and safety. Yet ,”for couples with children, the dissolution rate for same-sex couples is more than double that of heterosexual couples.”

For children, being raised in a same-sex household is “a clear step down, on average, from households that unite children with their own mother and father.”

Concludes Regnerus, “Biology matters—as new research released this week confirms—and no amount of legislation, litigation, or cheerleading can alter that.”

Bottom line: there is a one-word answer to the question of whether we should fight the legalization of same-sex marriage with every fiber of our being. That word is “children.”

4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Chuck Anziulewicz

    February 13, 2015 1:57 pm at 1:57 pm

    Parenting and procreation are irrelevant to the issue of marriage equality for Gay couples:

    1: Couples do not need to marry to make babies.
    2: The ability or even desire to make babies are not prerequisites for obtaining a marriage license.
    3: Denying Gay couples the right to marry has never prevented them from adopting children.

    You know, Caiden, if you believe (as I suspect you do) that marriage provides a more stable home environment for the raising of children, why deny adoptive Gay couples the option to marry? Conversely, why deny Gay couples the option to marry if they have no intention of having children.

    Bryan Fischer’s column makes no sense.

    • George Lujack

      George Lujack

      February 13, 2015 5:00 pm at 5:00 pm

      Bryan Fischer’s column makes perfect sense.

      1: “Couples do not need to marry to make babies.” True, but irrelevant. Heterosexual couples can make babies; homosexual couples cannot.

      2: “The ability or even desire to make babies are not prerequisites for obtaining a marriage license.” True but irrelevant. Marriage is a privilege, NOT a right. Marriage licenses should be granted to people based on stability of family and society. Homosexuals are perverting their sex organs to be used with the same sex, not as they were intended for procreation. Heterosexuals do not have an absolute right to marry. Brothers cannot marry sisters, mothers cannot marry sons, and there are age restrictions before heterosexuals can marry.

      3: “Denying Gay couples the right to marry has never prevented them from adopting children.” Not true. many states only allow heterosexual married couples to adopt children. Florida (currently) does not allow homosexual couples to either marry or adopt.

      The truth is that homosexuals should not only not be allowed to marry, but homosexual conduct should be criminalized as it has historically been and still is in many countries. Every country that has ever embraced homosexuality has declined and has been destroyed from within. There is no thriving homosexual nation on earth.

      Homosexual men are largely responsible for spreading HIV and AIDS throughout America and the rest of the world. That is not homophobia; it is homo-fact. Homosexual behavior needs to be rightly stigmatized as an abominable sexual perversion that it is, rather than celebrated, legitimized and equalized with heterosexuality and traditional normal marriage between a husband and wife.

      • Joe

        February 15, 2015 2:23 pm at 2:23 pm

        Do you really think the government has the right to tell you who you are allowed to love or what you do in the privacy of your own home? Criminalizing homosexual behavior sounds like big government to me, buddy.

  2. Chuck Anziulewicz

    February 17, 2015 11:25 am at 11:25 am

    George Lujack writes, “Homosexuals should not only not be allowed to marry, but homosexual conduct should be criminalized as it has historically been and still is in many countries.”

    Well, that used to be the case until Lawrence v. Texas. And unless the Constitution only applies to people who are Straight (i.e. heterosexual), there is simply no justification for denying law-abiding, taxpaying Gay couples the exact same legal benefits and opportunities that Straight couples have always taken for granted.

    But if it will make you feel any better, it will have precisely ZERO impact on you, your family, or your church.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Most Popular

To Top