Connect with us

Culture

Pastor will not take mark of the beast, will go to jail

Bryan Fischer

Published

on

MARRIAGE. A marriage between a man and a woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this state. – Idaho Constitution, Article III, Section 28

GUARANTY OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY. The exercise and enjoyment of religious faith and worship shall forever be guaranteed; and no person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege, or capacity on account of his religious opinions. ~ Idaho Constitution, Article I, Section 4

Last week, I wrote that today’s “mark of the beast” is the gay rainbow. If you don’t have the gay rainbow sticker plastered all over your forehead and forearm and the windows of your business, you will not be allowed to buy or sell. Bakers, florists, photographers, bed and breakfast owners, counselors and broadcasters have discovered this the hard way.

Now pastors are being required to take the mark or be sent to jail.

As impossible as this should be in America, the land of the free and the home of religious liberty, it is happening as we speak in Idaho, one of the most conservative states in the union.

There, in Coeur D’Alene, ordained ministers Donald Knapp and his wife Evelyn are going to spend 180 days in jail and be fined $1000 a day for politely declining to perform a sodomy-based marriage ceremony.

Yes, you read that right. Declining to perform a homosexual wedding is now a crime in America.

If you ever doubted that the homosexual agenda is the greatest threat to religious liberty we have ever faced in American history, doubt no longer.

The Knapps run the Hitching Post Wedding Chapel. Last Friday, a practitioner of the infamous crime against nature called them to ask the Knapps to perform a wedding for him and his partner.

All this since John Roberts and Supreme Court used their gavels like sledgehammers to shatter Idaho’s constitution and its protection for natural marriage into little tiny shards.

Homosexuals have been dancing in the streets in Idaho since same-sex nuptials began last week. Now they intend to dance on the the grave of the Knapps’ wedding business.

After the Knapps declined, the Gruppenfuhrers who run the city are now intent on putting the Knapps behind bars for six months and fining them $180,000 unless they surrender every principle of conscience they hold dear and start performing ceremonies which God has clearly condemned.

And it’s not as if homosexuals have no other options. They literally can go right across the street and get married in the Kootenai County courthouse any time they please. This is proof that the Gay Gestapo is not about tolerance and live-and-let-live at all. They are the biggest bullies and bigots on the block.

If this sounds like secular Sharia to you, there is nothing wrong with your hearing. Secular fundamentalists in America are as much of a threat to liberty as the mullahs in Iran.

You will hear a bunch of legalistic argle-bargle about public accommodations and such. Don’t be deceived. All that is just thinly-veiled cover for anti-Christian bigotry and heterophobia.

The city is basing its Nazi-esque brutality on its “non-discrimination” ordinance. This is laughable on its face. This ordinance is in fact a “pro-discrimination” ordinance since it enshrines, celebrates and honors blatant and egregious discrimination of the worst kind against people of faith.

Pastors are persons, and the Idaho state constitution explicitly declares that “no person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege, or capacity on account of his religious opinions.” Unless, of course, the gay mafia is after you. In that case, Christians have no rights which secularists are bound to respect.

All this grieves the heart of God, but delights the heart of the Prince of Darkness. To paraphrase Don McLean: as the flames climbed high into the night to light the abominable rite, I saw Satan laughing with delight, the day that marriage died.

Bryan Fischer is a senior columnist for Cowger Nation, and the radio host of Focal Point, where he provides expertise on a wide range of public policy topics.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Pingback: Exposed: Gregory Tucker Helped Pass Legislation to Shut Down Christian Companies

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Culture

THE MOST STUPID THING IN SPORTS/ATHLETICS TODAY: Transgender-women vs. actual women.

Jimmy Zulz

Published

on

I think that women are starting to react and push back a bit. Finally. This is easily the most stupid thing in sports, and it boggles my mind that the people running these events haven’t put a stop to it already. And that thing is: transgender women are competing with God-made women.

I will guarantee you that there are going to be some male athletes (not all and probably not most), who are unable to compete and win in male competition, so they think hey, this is a great way to be more successful in (fill in the blank).  So, they go through the surgeries and whatever is necessary to compete as a woman and… voila! Now, they are up at the top in competition.

I heard a possibly transitioning-man on sports talk radio (I’m sorry they’re even talking about this) call in and he said, “If the man is going to go through the hardship and painful surgery to become a woman, women in that sport are just going to have to suck it up and realize she’s every bit as much a woman as they all are.”

And that’s the problem: he-now-she is much more than the God-made women in that sport, so he-now-she has an enormous advantage. Strength and ability will likely be more than most women can compete with. It’s absolute bull-crap.

The fact that some women athletes are speaking up is why they were talking about it on the radio. At some point, these God-made women are going to have to DEMAND that trans-she-males will have to have their own division, because putting men in competition with women is flat out unfair. I can’t imagine why this wasn’t done immediately.

Continue Reading

Culture

MAKING KIDS GAY? Disney to begin indoctrinating and exposing children to homosexuality.

Caiden Cowger

Published

on

Tonight, Disney Channel is airing an episode of Andi Mack, featuring its “first gay coming-out story.” This episode will mark the primer of the show’s second season, and is directed at children ages 10 and up.

Andi’s friend Cyrus Goodman (played by Joshua Rush) will begin his coming-out journey as a homosexual. Disney is using a 15-year-old boy, Joshua Rush, as an instrument to promote the homosexual lifestyle, while also exposing Rush to homosexual behavior in the process. Disney Channel is actively participating in the corruption of a minor.

It is expected that this plot-line could potentially lead to underage, teenage boys participating in same-sex kissing. This perversion will broadcast to millions of teenagers and children across America, exposing them to homosexual behavior. Such programming can cause confusion in minors, leading them to question their sexual preference, starting at the young age of just 10 years old.

“‘Andi Mack’ is a story about ‘tweens’ figuring out who they are,” Disney Channel expressed in a statement earlier this week. “Everyone involved in the show takes great care in ensuring that it’s appropriate for all audiences and sends a powerful message about inclusion and respect for humanity.”

The story line also gained praise from the GLAAD LGBT advocacy organization.

“With more and more young people coming out as LGBTQ, Andi Mack is reflecting the lives and lived experiences of so many LGBTQ youth around the country,” the organization’s president and CEO, Sarah Kate Ellis, released in a statement. “Television reflects the real life world and today that includes LGBTQ youth who deserve to see their lives depicted on their favorite shows. Disney has been a leader in LGBTQ inclusion and there are so many young people who will be excited to see Cyrus’ story unfold.”

The first episode airs October 27, 2017, at 8:00p | ET.

Continue Reading

Culture

THE CO-ED SCOUTS OF AMERICA

George Lujack

Published

on

On October 11, 2017, the Boy Scouts of America’s board of directors unanimously agreed to allow girls to join the Cub Scouts and Boy Scouts, giving girls the opportunity to earn the highest rank of Eagle Scout.

“I’m saying that the Boy Scouts have a standard. You must be a biological boy to be a Boy Scout. You have to be a boy to be a Boy Scout.”

“Where is that written though?”

“In the name, ‘Boy’ Scouts.”
– Ben Shapiro

Not anymore, Ben. This is 2017 and this is the new progressive Boy Scouts of America, who announced that they will begin to allow girls to join their ranks.

What Ben Shapiro said however, is nonetheless true, “You must be a biological boy to be a Boy Scout. You have to be a boy to be a Boy Scout.” If the ‘Boy’ Scouts do not change the name of their organization to “The Scouts,” or something similar, the organization will be taking a stand in the cultural war on the side of liberal progressives over the issue of gender neutrality. Any girl who states, “I am a ‘Boy’ Scout,” will be unwittingly stating that she is a boy, even if she is a genuine scout, the type of girl who likes the scouting activities that the Boy Scouts provide and are involved in.

Although the Boy Scouts’ board of directors voted to allow girls to join their ranks, they were within their First Amendment Constitutionally protected right of freedom of association to deny them entry.

The Girl Scouts of America could wind up being a casualty of the Boy Scouts’ decision to recruit girls into their membership rolls. Back in August, the head of the Girl Scouts accused the Boy Scouts organization of a “covert campaign to recruit girls,” as a way to boost declining membership. If girls across America decide to join the Boy Scouts, en masse, it could mean the end of the Girl Scouts as a viable organization.

Other than the issue of a girl calling herself a “‘Boy’ Scout,” conservatives should not be overly concerned with co-ed scouting. Boys and girls have enjoyed a long history of sharing summer camp activities together in America, without becoming gender neutral. Boys will still be boys and girls will still be girls (most of the time).

“Girls will be boys and boys will be girls it’s a mixed up muddled up shook up world…”
– The Kinks, “Lola

However, the gender-neutral minded cultural elites would like to redefine the gender roles of boys and girls in society and confuse the gender identity of boys and girls, when possible, which is the real issue that is rightfully alarming to most Americans. Progressives have long sought to corrupt and neuter the Boy Scouts through social engineering, as they have likewise done in other institutions, and have now succeeded in doing so.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Most Popular